RANCHI, India, June 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 8: Heard Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, learned A.P.P. for the State. This appeal is directed against the order dated 27.01.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Palamau at Daltonganj in B.P. No. 03/2025, arising out of Nawa Bazar P.S. Case No. 77 of 2024, whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been...
RANCHI, India, June 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 8: 1. Since the impugned order has been passed on 04.07.2023 and the appeal was filed on 05.12.2023, though there is some delay in filing the appeal, the same is condoned and I.A. No.550 of 2025 is allowed. L.P.A. No. 688 of 2023 2. Order impugned in this Letters Patent Appeal is an order passed on 04.07.2023 by the learned Single Judge in W.P. (S) No.3707 of 200 directing the appellants to consider the case of t...
RANCHI, India, June 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 8: 1. Both the appeals are arising out of the same accident and in view of that both the appeals are heard together with consent of the parties. 2. Heard Mr. Ashutosh Anand, learned counsel appearing for the appellant in both the appeals and Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.7 and respondent No.3 in M.A. No.390 of 2023 and M.A. No.391 of 2023 respectively and Mr. Zaid Ahmed, l...
RANCHI, India, June 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 8: 1. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that this appeal has been preferred on the ground that no evidence has been brought by the claimants to establish that the business of milk has been closed or the cows have been sold and the cows are still there. He submits that loss has not been traced and he further submits that the other grounds have also been taken. . I. A. No.3946 of 2024 has been filed for ...
RANCHI, India, June 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 8: 1. This present appeal has been filed on the ground that the right of recovery from the appellant who is the owner of the vehicle in question has been wrongly passed in favour of the insurance company. 2. It has been pointed out that the Certificate Case has also been instituted in which the notice has been issued and the appellant herein has appeared in the Certificate Case and for the stay of the same, I.A No...
RANCHI, India, June 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 8: 1. One of the grounds taken by the insurance company herein is that the notice was not served upon the insurance company and the ex-parte award has been passed. 2. In view of that fact, the insurance company herein is directed to deposit the entire awarded amount before the learned Tribunal within three weeks. However, the same will not be released at present by the learned Tribunal and the claimants are kept a...
RANCHI, India, June 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 8: 1. In view of the facts involved in the present appeal, the insurance company is directed to deposit the entire awarded amount along with the interest before the learned Tribunal within three weeks. 2. Out of the deposited amount, 50% shall be released in favour of the claimants in terms of the direction no.1 i.e equally 50% each on proper verification. 3. The rest of the amount shall be kept intact and that ...
RANCHI, India, June 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 8: 1. Mr. Nikhil Ranjan, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the points involved in the present appeal are that deceased was not the third party and in view of that the liability cannot be fastened upon the insurance company in light of Section 163(A) of Motor Vehicle Act and only maximum of Rs.One lac can be awarded in favour of the deceased. 2. In view of the above facts, the insurance company is ...
RANCHI, India, June 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 8: 1. Learned counsel has appeared on behalf of the O.P.Nos.1 and 2 as well as O.P.No.5. 2. Notice of O.P.Nos.3 has been received by self and notice upon the respondent no.4 has been received by his wife and in spite of that, they have not appeared till today. Thus, notice upon them are deemed to be validly served, however, no one has appeared on their behalf. 3. Let it appear after summer vacation under the app...
RANCHI, India, June 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 8: 1. The instant appeal under section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 is directed against the judgment dated 19.07.2023 passed in Original Suit No.952 of 2022 by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Additional Family Court - II, Ranchi (in short, learned Family Judge) whereby and whereunder the suit filed for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty by filing an application under Section 13 (1) (i-a...