RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. The present appeal is directed against the Judgment of conviction dated 30.11.2018 and order of sentence dated 01.12.2018, passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Pakur, in Sessions Trial No.45 of 2017, arising out of Littipara P.S. Case No.22 of 2015 (G.R. No.338 of 2015), whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 370(2) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and has been senten...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs; i) For quashing of Memo No.603 dated 14.12.2023 [Annexure-3] issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro whereby the application of petitioner has been rejected to reinstate in service in the light of judgement dated 16.10.2020 [Annexure-1] passed in WP(S) No.6436/2010 with...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs; i) For quashing of Memo No.603 dated 14.12.2023 [Annexure-3] issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro whereby the application of petitioner has been rejected to reinstate in service in the light of judgement dated 16.10.2020 [Annexure-1] passed in WP(S) No.6436/2010 with...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is having no instructions from his client, as such he is unable to press this writ application. 2. However, looking to the prayer made in this writ application and the nature of punishment, this Court proceeds to decide this case on merit. 3. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner, praying therein for quashing of Memo No. 2494 ...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard Mr Abhay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Gaurav Raj, learned A.C. to A.A.G-II for the State. 2. This petition challenges the Jharkhand Society Registration Rules, 2025 (the said Rules), on the grounds that the said Rules are ultra vires the parent act i.e. the Societies Registration Act, 1860, as applicable to the State of Jharkhand. 3. On 29.04.2026, when this matter was fi...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. By adopting the reasoning in our order dated 28.04.2026 disposing of W.P (C) No. 2610 of 2026 (M/s Shiv Jyoti Stone Minerals versus The State of Jharkhand and others), we dismiss this petition. In M/s Shiv Jyoti Stone Minerals (Supra), we have held that the authorities dealing with applications under Rule 23(1) of the Jharkhand Mineral Concession Rules, 2004...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the judgment dated 21.01.2019 (Annexure-6) passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ranchi in Bihar Shops & Establishment Case No. 10 of 2016 whereby the petition filed by the original petitioner under section 26 of the Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, 1953, has been dismissed. ...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the parties agree that the issue in this petition stands covered by our order dated 07.04.2026, disposing of W.P.(T) No. 2270 of 2026 (M/s Ranjan Construction Vs. Union of India & Ors.). Therefore, by adopting the reasonings in the above referred order, we dispose of this petition, by granting the petitioner liberty to challenge the impugned...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs; (i) For issuance of appropriate writ(s), order(s), and/or direction, including a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing order of punishment contained in Notification No. 1736 dated 27.04.2022 (Annexure-6 to the writ application), by which warning has been awarded t...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. The instant application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for quashing the order dated 14.07.2021(Annexure-9); whereby his request of reinstatement has been rejected on 14.07.2021. 2. The petitioner has further prayed for his reinstatement with back wages with all consequential benefits. 3. The brief facts of the case is that the Inquiry officer submitted his enquiry report & charges l...