RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: 1. Insurance Company is in appeal against the award of compensation passed under Section 166 of the M.V. Act, 1988 in Compensation Case No.16/2011 whereby and whereunder a compensation of Rs.14,24,053/- has been awarded in favour of the claimants for the death of Dablu Kumar Ray, who died in a motor vehicle accident involving a truck bearing registration no.JH-11D-5532 which was under the insurance cover of appe...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: I.A. No. 4476 of 2020 in M.A. No. 226 of 2020 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants in this interlocutory application which has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 1530 days in filing the instant misc. appeal. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that the delay was not intentional and due to financial condition of the appellants, they could no...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: 1. Both these appeals arise out of the common judgment and award of compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 in M.A.C No. 16 of 2013, whereby and whereunder liability to pay compensation of Rs.7,07,500/- has been fixed on the Insurance-Company. 2. Miscellaneous Appeal No. 691 of 2018 has been preferred by the InsuranceCompany, whereas M.A. No. 660 of 2018 has been preferred by the claimant...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: 1. Both these appeals arise out of the common judgment and award of compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 in M.A.C No. 16 of 2013, whereby and whereunder liability to pay compensation of Rs.7,07,500/- has been fixed on the Insurance-Company. 2. Miscellaneous Appeal No. 691 of 2018 has been preferred by the InsuranceCompany, whereas M.A. No. 660 of 2018 has been preferred by the claimant...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: 1. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons stated in the application duly supported by the affidavit of the applicant-appellant, we find sufficient cause to condone the delay of 192 days that has crept up in filing of the appeal. 2. Ordered accordingly. 3. I.A. No.2221 of 2025 is disposed of. L.P.A. No.176 of 2025: 4. The present appeal has been preferred against the order date...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: 1. The appellant-workman was a permanent employee of the respondent-company since 1974 and was made to retire on 1st July, 2010. According to the workman, he was wrongly made to retire as his date of birth had not been correctly reflected in the official record for which he had raised an industrial dispute. 2. The Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Jamshedpur adjudicated the dispute by answering the referen...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 28.04.2025 passed in W.P.(L) No. 3018 of 2012 whereby the writ petition filed by the petitioner/appellant has been dismissed and the award passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal no. 2, Dhanbad in Reference case no. 12 of 2006 has been affirmed. 2. The factual background of the case is that the respondent no. 1 namely Awinash Kuma...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: 1. Heard Mr. Harendra Kr. Mahato, learned counsel for the appellant and Mrs. Swati Shalini, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-CCL as well as Mr. Gaurav Raj, learned AC to AAG-II for the State. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 22.07.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 4208 of 2023, whereby and whereunder, the writ application preferred by the writ-petitioner/appel...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: I. A. No. 13548 of 2025: Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned P.P. for the State. This interlocutory application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 3 days in filing this appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 3 days in filing this appeal is hereby co...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: 1. Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. This criminal revision petition has been preferred for setting-aside the order dated 09.01.2025 passed by the learned A.J.C.-VIII-cum-Spl. Judge, NDPS, Ranchi in Misc. Criminal Application No.2974/2024 (arising out of NDPS Case No.56/2022, Tamar P.S. Case No.53/202...