India, April 7 -- Central Information Commission issued text of the following decision on March 7:

Information sought: The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 24.11.2023 (online) seeking the following information:

"Supply Certified copies of information as well as orders issued by the Govt. of Delhi regarding declaration of containment zone at Raj Nagar II, Palam Colony, Delhi-110077 during COVID-19 pandemic with date and area wise.

Supply the Certified copies of orders by which to whom the power was given to issue orders in regard to attend office at the department level during COVID-19. "

Having not received any response from the PIO, the appellant filed a First Appeal dated 24.01.2024. The FAA vide order is not on record.

Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied, appellant approached the Commission with the instant Second Appeal.

A written submission dated 22.02.2025 (copy marked to the appellant) has been filed by Shri Rajeev Kumar, Dy. Secretary/PIO, CM's Office, Delhi is taken on record. Contents of the same are reproduced below for ready reference:

"1. As per the available record of online RTI portal the application of Sh. Jawahar Lal (Appellant) was received vide reference No. CMOFC/R/2023/60579 dated 24.11.2023 (Flag-A). 2. Since the information sought by the appellant pertains to the Revenue Department, GNCTD, the Chief Minister Office transferred the RTI Application to the Revenue Department, GNCTD, through online portal to the PIO, Revenue Department, GNCTD, under section 6(3) of RTI Act, 2005 as the queries related to that department on 28.11.2023. (Flag-B). 3. Subsequently, Sh. Jawahar Lal (Appellant) filed a First appeal online before the First Appellate Authority of CM Office vide registration No. CMOFC/A/2024/60006 dated 24.01.2024 (Flag-C). 4. The First Appellate Authority of Chief Minister Office disposed of the First appeal with the observation:-

"I have gone through the records. It is observed that PIO, CM Office on 28.11.2023 had transferred on-line RTI application to PIO, Revenue Department under section 6(3) of RTI Act, 2005 as the queries related to that department. Thus, PIO CM office responded timely"(Flag-D).

Accordingly, the above information is respectfully submitted for your kind consideration and appropriate disposal."

A written submission dated 01.03.2025 (copy marked to the appellant) filed by Shri Harshit Saini, SDM/PIO, Dwarka, New Delhi is taken on record. Contents of the same are reproduced below for ready reference:

"This is with reference to the CIC's Notice No. CIC/00CMD /A/ 2024 /616750 dated 14.02.2025, which is forwarded to this office via email only on 28.02.2025, in the matter of RTI Application dated 24.11.2023 filed by Sh.Jawahar Lal R/o RZF-*******, Delhi-77.

In this regard, it is to submit that the said notice dated l4.02.2025 of the Hon'ble Commission was received in the Sub-Division Office via email only on 28.02.2025. It is further submitted that the RTI Application dated 24.11.2023 has not been found received in this office.

It is further humbly submitted that the undersigned has assumed the charge of PIO/SDM (Dwarka) only w.e.f. 30.11.2024 and was busy in Delhi Legislative Assembly Elections, being Returning Officer for AC-33 (Dwarka).

In view of the above, the Hon'ble Commission is humbly requested to grant time so that the requisite information/appropriate response, if available on record, shall be provided to the appellant, as per provisions of RTI Act, 2005. The undersigned have utmost respect for the orders of Hon'ble Commission and is duty bound to comply with the directions as may be passed by this Hon'ble Commission."

Relevant Facts emerged during Hearing:

The following were present:-

Appellant: Present in person.

Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, Dy. Secretary/PIO along with Shri Vikas, ASO Chief Minister's Office, Delhi present in person.

Shri Vikas Kumar, Sr. Assistant (on behalf of Shri Harshit Saini, SDM/PIO, Dwarka, New Delhi) present in person.

The appellant stated that he has received replies from the PIO during pendency of this appeal and a copy of the averred written submissions of the respondent few days back which is a delayed response. Further, he contended that desired information was yet to be provided to him by the respondents.

*Rest of the document can be viewed at: (https://dsscic.nic.in/cause-list-report-web/download)

Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.