GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 28 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 27:

1. Heard Mr. M.Chanda, learned counsel for the writ petitioners. Also heard Mr. U.K. Goswami, learned CGC, appearing for the respondents.

2. The petitioners have prayed for setting aside the impugned notification dated 02/10/2012, by which the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Border Roads Development Board, General Reserve Engineering Force (Border Roads Organisation) Junior Engineer (Electrical and Mechanical) Group 'B' post, Recruitment Rules, 2012 (herein after referred to as the 2012 Rules) has been enacted, under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India. The further prayer of the petitioners is to frame Service Rules in consonance with General Reserve Engineering Force (Group - C & D) Recruitment Rules, 1982 (herein after referred to as the 1982 Rules) and the amended Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 1996 (herein after referred to as the 1996 Rules), for providing promotional avenues to the petitioners, including promotion to the posts of Charge Mechanic.

3. The petitioners' further case is that the 2012 Rules should be set aside, in so far as the promotional avenue of the petitioners, who are employed as Turners, have been extinguished, for being promoted to their earlier promotional post of Charge Mechanic, which has now been re-designated as Junior Engineer (E &M).

4. The petitioners' case is that in terms of the 1982 and 1996 Rules, the Turners employed under the Border Road Organisation (BRO) were having 10% promotional quota to the post of Charge Mechanic. The petitioners, who are Turners, have the educational qualification of 2 years Diploma in Turner trade. The Vehicle Mechanics, who have the educational qualification of 2 years Diploma in Vehicle Mechanic are also in the feeder for promotion to the post of Charge Mechanic. However, with the coming into force of the 2012 Rules, the 10% promotional quota for Turners, for promotion to the post of Charge Mechanic was done away with. However, the Vehicle Mechanics continued to be in feeder posts for promotion to the post of Charge Mechanic even under the 2012 Rules.

5. The petitioners' counsel submits that promotion being a condition of service, the respondents could not have taken away the promotional avenue of the petitioners, without giving any justifiable reasons for the same. He also submits that though the 1982 Rules was superseded by the 2012 Rules, the 2012 Rules was arbitrary and liable to be struck down, as it was in violation of Article 14 & 16 of the Constitution.

6. Mr. U.K. Goswami, the learned CGC, on the other hand, submits that there was no infirmity with doing away with the promotional avenue of the petitioners to the post of Charge Mechanic by way of 2012 Rules, in view of the fact that the post of Charge Mechanic (Diploma holders) was re-designated as Junior Engineer (E & M), as the Charge Mechanic (Diploma holders) post was merged with various other posts, such as Superintendent (E&M-I), Superintendent (E&M-II) (Diploma holder) and Charge Electrician (Diploma holder), vide letter No. F. No. BRDB/06/166/2010/GE-I dated 13/05/2010, issued by the Under Secretary to the Government of India, Border Road Development Board. Mr. Goswami submits that in view of the incumbents in the post of Charge Mechanic, (diploma holders) being re-designated as Junior Engineer (E &M), non-diploma personnel were to keep their status until they were wasted out or till they acquired higher qualification for getting further promotion. Based on the needs and the situation in hand, the 2012 Rules was promulgated and the BRO being a work oriented organisation, maintenance of plants and machinery was of utmost importance.

*Rest of the document can be viewed at: (https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/ecourtindiaHC/cases/display_pdf.php?filename=tuqye3PhFs%2BBDn75ghiOpMA%2F%2Beq3UFPDjzfPmgx5gybnNPN%2BNuLu9QX9bV1tu1x0&caseno=WP(C)/3056/2023&cCode=1&cino=GAHC010101082023&state_code=6&appFlag=)

Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.