RANCHI, India, Jan. 3 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Dec. 2:
1. Heard Mr. Birendra Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned Spl. P.P. for the National Investigating Agency.
2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 22.05.2025 passed in Misc. Criminal Application No. 727 of 2025, in connection with Special (NIA) Case No. 02/2020 arising out of NIA Case No. RC 25/2020/NIA/DLI (Chandwa P.S. Case No. 158/2019) by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XVI-cum-Special Judge, NIA, Ranchi, whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected.
3. The prosecution case is that on 22.11.2019 at 8:00 P.M., a patrolling party of Chandwa Police Station in course of patrolling duty stopped at Lukuiya More at Chandwa. It has been alleged that the cadre of banned terrorist organization i.e. CPI (Maoist) who were waiting in advance, fired indiscriminately at the police patrolling party which led to the death of 4 police personnel. Arms and ammunitions were also looted from the martyred police personnel and by raising slogans, the Maoists fled away. Later on, one of the Home Guard namely, Dinesh Ram who had escaped unhurt, rushed to the Chandwa Police Station and lodged a complaint. 4. Based on the aforesaid allegations, Chandwa P.S. Case No. 158 of 2019 was instituted against 18 named and some unknown accused persons. On completion of investigation, chargesheet was submitted against Baijnath Ganjhu, Sunil Ganjhu @ Mangra, Rajesh Kumar Ganjhu, Sanjay Ganjhu, Naresh Ganjhu and Faguna Ganjhu. The Central Government in exercise of its power conferred under Sub-section (5) of Section 6 read with Section 8 of the National Investigating Agency Act, 2008 vide M.H.A. New Delhi, CTCR Division Order no. 11011/42/2020/NIA dated 22.06.2020 directed the NIA to take up the investigation and accordingly, Chandwa P.S. Case No. 158 of 2019 was re-registered as R.C. No. 25 of 2020/NIA/DLI under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 302, 353 & 379 of Indian Penal Code, under Section 27 of the Arms Act, under Section 17 (i) & (ii) of Criminal Law Amendment Act and under Sections 10, 13, 17 and 18 of Unlawful Activity (Prevention) Act, 1967. The NIA had submitted the first supplementary charge-sheet against 34 persons for the offences punishable under Sections 120 (B), 121, 121 (A), 122, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 353, 395, 396 & 427 of Indian Penal Code, under Sections 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 38, 39 & 40 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and under Sections 25 (1-b) a, 26, 27 & 35 of the Arms Act. 5. It has been submitted by Mr. Birendra Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has been implicated primarily on account of the fact that he was an overground worker of the terrorist organisation and had given logistic support to the members of the said organisation. Learned counsel adds that admittedly, the appellant had not taken part in the indiscriminate firing made by the CPI maoist which resulted in the death of four police personnel.
*Rest of the document can be viewed at: (https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/ecourtindiaHC/cases/display_pdf.php?filename=A9S7c5LDIsB6RXaCf816x0L%2F7k3TbVBVh4uNg%2BMn3GctqFN6SoAVt9CldYxK1QY%2F&caseno=Cr.A(DB)/1132/2025&cCode=1&cino=JHHC010210892025&state_code=7&appFlag=)
Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.
