JABALPUR, India, Sept. 23 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 22:
1. Appellant is aggrieved by an order dated 16.05.2025, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant has been dismissed on the ground that there is an alternative remedy of redressal against the award passed under the Right to Fair Compensation And Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
2. Petitioner is aggrieved by an award dated 28.11.2024 passed under the said Act and contends that the valuation has not been corrected and correct compensation has not been assessed.
3. The remedy of the appellant, if dissatisfied with the award, is under Section 64 of the said Act. Since there is a mechanism for redressal provided against the award, the writ Court has dismissed the petition relegating the appellant to avail of the remedies available under the said Act.
4. We find that there is no error committed by the learned writ Court in declining to entertain the writ petition.
5. We find no merit in the appeal, the appeal is consequently dismissed.
Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.