SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: Heard Mr. S.A.Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Issue notice. Mrs. T.Yangi B. learned AAG assisted by Mr. E.R.Chyne, learned GA is present and accepts notice on behalf of all the respondents, as such, no further notice is required. List this matter on 04-05-2026 for instructions and affidavit. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: Heard learned counsels appearing for the parties at some length. Further hearing will continue on the next date. As prayed for, list this matter after 2 (two) weeks. Parties shall be at liberty to file written synopsis of their respective arguments. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. Heard Mr. M.F. Qureshi, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant, who has submitted that the applicant has filed an appeal before this Court, being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 17.10.2025 passed by the Court of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), South West Khasi Hills District, Mawkyrwat in Special (POCSO) Case No. 7 of 2023, wherein, he was di...
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. Records would show that an FIR dated 21.05.2014 was lodged by one Shri. Dorjee Wangdak informing the Officer-in-Charge of Lumdiengjri Police Station, Shillong of a Motor accident which occurred on 08.05.2014 at about 07:50 PM or so. 2. It is the narration of the informant that his brother Shri. Ngawang Gyaltsen, was returning home from Police Bazaar, Shillong riding his scooty bearing registrati...
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. Though Ms. M.L.Tlau, learned counsel for the petitioner has been at pains to satisfy this Court that the cause of action still survives, however, with the revocation of the status quo ante order by order dated 18-03-2026, passed by the Commissioner & Secretary, Education Department, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous, and as such is accordingly closed. 2. Matter accordingly ...
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. The brief facts of the case are that the writ petitioners herein numbering 45(forty-five), who were contractual Government Teachers, teaching in Lower Primary Schools were terminated on 15.12.2020, on not having the requisite qualification of Meghalaya Teachers Eligibility Test (MTET). 2. The grievance of the writ petitioners as projected in the writ petition is that after 2019, though the Gover...
NAINITAL, India, May 11 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The order in original dated 25.07.2024 passed u/s 74 of the CGST/UKGST Act is under challenge essentially on the ground that the order has been passed without fixing any date for personal hearing although specific request for the same was made by the petitioner. 3. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Revenue, the said fact has been disput...
NAINITAL, India, May 11 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The main prayer made in the writ petition is for issuing appropriate direction to the respondentdevelopment authority to execute the demolition order dated 23.08.2024 (Annexure No.1) passed against respondent no.4. 3. In the compliance affidavit filed by respondent no.2 the stand taken is that an appeal is pending against the sealing order dated 12.0...
NAINITAL, India, May 11 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 01.04.2022 cancelling the GST registration of the petitioner-firm on the ground that it has failed to file the returns within the prescribed period. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in identical facts and circumstances in WPMB No. 39 of 2025, a Coordinate Bench has permitted the petitioner therein to file an application for revocati...
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. The writ petitioner a registered Class-I Government contractor under the Public Works Department being aggrieved with the action of the respondent No. 5, in commencing the execution of a public road construction work for the "Improvement of the existing road including MBT of New Nongstoin to Nongstoin Village" including different link roads within Nongstoin in the month of October, 2024, without a...