JABALPUR, India, Dec. 14 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgmenton Nov. 13: 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the contempt petition was disposed of in view of the reply filed by the respondents. He submits that the respondents had incorrectly stated that the order had been complied with even till date, order has not been complied with. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition reserving the right of the petitioner to approach the Co...
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 14 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgmenton Nov. 13: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to the District Judge, Budhni, District Sehore to decide their application filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that he has no objection to the application being considered and disposed of expeditiously. I...
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 14 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgmenton Nov. 13: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to the District Judge, Budhni, District Sehore to decide his application filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that he has no objection to the application being considered and disposed of expeditiously. In vi...
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 14 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgmenton Nov. 13: Learned counsel for the respondent submits that petitioner has not participated in the subject tender. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner could not be participated in the subject tender before filing the petition, however, in a connected petition i.e. Writ Petition No.43081/2025 petitioner has participated without prejudice to the rights and contentions. He, however, seeks lea...
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 14 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgmenton Nov. 13: 1. The instant Second Appeal is preferred by the Jabalpur Development Authority under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 being aggrieved by the order passed by M.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Bhopal in Appeal No.A-36/2019 and A-52/2019 on 22.01.2020, whereby the appeal preferred by the respondent was partly allowed and the appeal preferred by the appellant was di...
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 14 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgmenton Nov. 13: I.A. No.22230/2025 : This is an application for condonation of delay of 10 days in filing the present MCC. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the MCC is condoned and IA stands allowed. MCC No.3961/2025 : Petitioners seek restoration of W.A. No.1598/2024 which was dismissed for non-compliance of common conditional order dated 22.01.2025. Learned counsel for the petition...
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 14 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgmenton Nov. 13: I.A. No.23001/2025 : This is an application for condonation of delay of 417 days in filing the present MCC. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the MCC is condoned and IA stands allowed. MCC No.4051/2025 : 1. Petitioner seeks restoration of W.A. No.880/2023 which was dismissed for non-compliance of common conditional order dated 09.05.2024. 2. Learned counsel for the pet...
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 14 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgmenton Nov. 13: 1. The instant writ appeal is preferred by taking exception to the order dated 06.12.2024 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P. No.12101/2024, whereby the writ petition filed by respondent No.1 was allowed and the charge-sheet issued to the respondent was quashed. 2. Heard Shri Greeshm Jain, Advocate appeared on behalf of appellant and Shri K.C. Ghildiyal, Senior Advocate with Shri Karnik Singh, Ad...
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 14 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgmenton Nov. 13: 1. Appellant impugns order dated 24.07.2025, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the order of termination dated 13.06.2022 has been dismissed. 2. Petitioner was appointed on the post of Assistant Technology Manager on contractual basis. The contract was for a period of one year be extended from time to time. Petitioner claims that he had contracted Covid -19 and was admitted...
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 14 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgmenton Nov. 13: 1. Writ Appeal No.2640/2025 has been filed by Smt. Sarita Jain contending that after the order passed for removing the respondent No.1 Smt. Neha Jain, she was nominated on 29.08.2025 and as such she is directly affected by the result of the said appeals as well as the writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants i.e. State of Madhya Pradesh and Smt. Sarita Jain pray that the appeals be dispo...