JABALPUR, India, Jan. 3 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 3: This is an application on behalf of appellant seeking conversion of the Second Appeal into a Misc. Second Appeal in accordance with Chapter 2 rule 12(A) of M.P. High Court Rules, 2008. Since notice has not yet been issued and as per said Rule only a MSA lies against an order passed by the M.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, leave is granted. Registry is directed to register this Second Appeal ...
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 3 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 3: Learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner submits that there is technical defect in the petition accordingly, he seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 3 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 3: 1. Petitioner impugns the NIT advertisement dated 03.11.2025 and detailed NIT dated 05.11.2025. The contention of the petitioner is that the certain conditions have been imposed in the tender document for the first time requiring the bidders to own certain machineries. He submits that there are several machineries mentioned require for completion of work however for certain expensive machineries ...
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 3 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 3: Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a Misc. Second Appeal in accordance with Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 3 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 3: After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 3 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 3: By IA No.23355/2025, petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition reserving the right of the petitioner to approach National Company Law Tribunal. In view of the above, application is allowed. Consequently, Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 3 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 2: 1. Appellant impugns order dated 10.10.2025 to the limited extent that a cost of Rs.10,000/- has been imposed on the appellant. 2. Learned counsel for appellant submits that appellant is an agriculturist and had filed the subject petition. He submits that on the very first date, when Court was not inclined, he sought leave to withdraw the writ petition however, while permitting withdrawal, cost...
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 3 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 2: 1. Instant intra Court appeal is preferred by State of M.P. and others assailing order dated 10.05.2024 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P. No.24408 of 2018, whereby the writ petition preferred by the respondent challenging the recovery from his retiral dues was partly allowed with a direction to refund the amount alongwith interest to the respondent. 2. Heard on I.A. No.2862/2025, which is ...
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 3 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 2: IA No.23842 of 2025 This is an application for condonation of delay of 204 days in filing the present MCC. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the MCC is condoned and IA stands allowed. MCC No.2845 of 2025 Petitioner seeks restoration of W.A.No.2390/2023, which was dismissed for non-compliance of common conditional order dated 08.11.2024. The counsel for petitioner su...
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 3 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 2: Petitioner impugns order dated 17.09.2025 on the ground that the Additional Collector had no jurisdiction to decide the objections of the petitioner under Section 3 G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956. We note that the impugned order dated 17.09.2025 merely places the file before the Collector for further proceedings. Since the final order has not been passed on the objections of the petiti...