JABALPUR, India, June 13 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on May 11: 1. This Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been preferred by the appellant/Insurance Company by taking exception to the Award dated 26/02/2022 passed by the Fourth Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gwalior in Claim Case No.500108/2015, whereby the Claims Tribunal awarded compensation in favour of the claimants by imposing liability upon the Ins...
JABALPUR, India, June 13 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on May 11: 1.The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief:- (i) Call for the record of the case. (ii) Declare that the petitioners are Bhumiswami and entitled for recording of their names in the revenue records. (iii) Restrain the respondents from taking possession from the petitioners. (iv) Issue any other writ/writs, ord...
JABALPUR, India, June 13 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on May 11: 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking following reliefs : 7.1 To call for the entire records of the learned Courts below for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. 7.2 To issue an appropriate writ/direction to set aside the orders dated 7/12/2012 (Ann.P-4) passed by the Learned Revenue Board Gwalior and 15/5/2008 (Annexure P-1) passed by t...
RANCHI, India, June 13 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 12: 1. Mr. Lalit Yadav, learned counsel for the appellant, on instruction, has submitted that the parties have settled their dispute outside the Court, as such he is not willing to press the present appeal. 2. Learned counsel also submitted that since he is not pressing the instant case, the defect(s) may be ignored. 3. Accordingly, the defects are hereby ignored and the instant first appeal being F.A. No. 97 o...
RANCHI, India, June 13 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 12: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. I.A. No.13497 of 2024 seeks condonation of delay of 153 days in instituting the Letters Patent Appeal. 3. In the original I.A. and affidavit accompanying the same there were hardly any reasons which could be construed as sufficient cause for condoning the delay. Therefore, an opportunity was granted to file a supplementary affidavit. 4. Though a long supplement...
RANCHI, India, June 13 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 12: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This I.A. seeks condonation of delay of 98 days in instituting this Appeal. We have perused the averments in the I.A. and the affidavit in support of the averments. Sufficient cause has been made out. 3. Therefore, we condone the delay and dispose of the I.A. L.P.A. No. 166 of 2025 4. By a separate order, we have condoned the delay and now, with the consent of ...
RANCHI, India, June 13 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 12: 1. Ms. Nidhi Lall, learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this appeal. 2. Leave is granted. 3. This appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, June 13 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 12: I.A. No. 8646 of 2023 1. The present interlocutory application seeks condonation of delay of 54 days in instituting this appeal. 2. We have perused the averments in the I.A. and we are satisfied that the cause shown is sufficient. 3. Accordingly, the delay is condoned and I.A. is disposed of. L.P.A. No. 642 of 2022 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. This appeal challenges the learned Single ...
RANCHI, India, June 13 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 12: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners, after facing trial, have been acquitted in the case being Lohardaga Mahila P.S. Case No. 25 of 2019, therefore, present revision against the order dated 04.02.2022 rejecting the discharge application filed by the present petitioners, has become infructuous. 2. In view of the above, this criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous. D...
RANCHI, India, June 13 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on May 12: 1. Heard Mr. Sarvendra Kumar, learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. 2. The instant criminal revision is preferred against the judgment dated 03.09.2016 passed in Cr. Appeal No.62 of 2014 by the learned Sessions Judge, Koderma, whereby and whereunder learned appellate court has rejected the appeal of petitioners with modification in convic...