NAINITAL, India, March 23 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 20: 1. This first bail application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the Applicant seeking regular bail in connection with Case Crime No.363 of 2025 under Section 64(2)(m), 308(2), 319(2), 352 of B.N.S., Police Station Bahadrabad, District Haridwar, during the pendency of trial. 2. As per the State's story as alleged in the FIR the applicant conceale...
NAINITAL, India, March 23 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 20: 1. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.05 of 2026 under Section 8/21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Police Station Nanakmatta, District Udham Singh Nagar. 2. Heard Ms. Sarita Bisht, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Chittrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for...
NAINITAL, India, March 23 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 20: 1. The present Bail Application has been moved by the Applicant-Bhupendra Singh, who is in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime No.22 of 2025, registered at Police Station Thalisain, District Pauri Garhwal, under Sections 8/20/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985. 2. Heard Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, learned counsel (through V.C.) for the Applicant and Mr. Chittrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for...
NAINITAL, India, March 23 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 20: 1. The challenge in this appeal is made to Order dated 02.02.2026, passed in Original Suit No.23 of 2026, Shri Tarun Kumar Vs. Shri Birju and others, by the court of Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Vikasnagar, District Dehradun ("the Suit"). By the impugned order, passed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ("the Code"). By it, the respondents in the suit including the appella...
NAINITAL, India, March 23 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 20: 1. This Appeal From Order has been preferred by the appellant-Insurance Company under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 01.03.2014 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / IVth Additional District Judge, Haridwar in Claim Petition No. 61 of 2011, whereby the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.3,39,000/- along with interest @ 7% per annum in ...
NAINITAL, India, March 23 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 20: 1. This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:- "(I) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar to decide the Civil Suit No.58 of 2023 expeditiously within 6 months. (II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of manda...
NAINITAL, India, March 23 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 20: 1. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, he is a landless person, who was allotted a piece of agricultural land declared surplus in proceedings under U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, vide order dated 13.01.2006. Grievance raised by petitioner is that his name is not being recorded in Category 1 kha i.e. Bhumidhar with non-transferable right. 2. Learned counsel f...
NAINITAL, India, March 23 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 20: 1. According to learned counsel for the petitioners, they are landless person, who were allotted a piece of agricultural land declared surplus in proceedings under U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, vide order dated 13.01.2006. Grievance raised by petitioners are that their name are not being recorded in Category 1 kha i.e. Bhumidhar with non-transferable right. 2. Learned c...
NAINITAL, India, March 23 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 20: 1. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, he is a landless person, who was allotted a piece of agricultural land declared surplus in proceedings under U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, vide order dated 13.01.2006. Grievance raised by petitioner is that his name is not being recorded in Category 1 kha i.e. Bhumidhar with non-transferable right. 2. Learned counsel f...
NAINITAL, India, March 23 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 20: 1. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, he is a landless person, who was allotted a piece of agricultural land declared surplus in proceedings under U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, vide order dated 13.01.2006. Grievance raised by petitioner is that his name is not being recorded in Category 1 kha i.e. Bhumidhar with non-transferable right. 2. Learned counsel f...