RANCHI, India, March 25 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 20: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that Rs.6,03,970/- has been recovered from the amount of gratuity of the petitioner on the ground that his first time bound promotion in 1995 was wrongly fixed. It is an admitted case that the benefit of time bound promotion has been withdrawn and the salary of the petitioner has been re-fixed at a lesser scale on the ground that the petitioner has...
RANCHI, India, March 25 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 20: 1. Heard Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, learned counsel for the appellants and learned Spl.P.P. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 21.01.2026 passed in MCA No.164 of 2026, arising out of Mahuda P.S. Case No. 69 of 2025, by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-VI, Dhanbad, whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellants has been rejected. 3. It appears that the appellants had earlier moved fo...
RANCHI, India, March 25 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 20: 1. Heard Mr. Pratiush Lala, learned counsel for the appellant and learned Spl. P.P. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 17.12.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sahibganj in Bail Petition No.383 of 2025 in connection with S.T. Case No.359 of 2025 arising out of Rail P.S. Sahibganj Case No.34 of 2025 corresponding to Railway G.R. No.67 of 2025, whereby and whereunder, the ...
RANCHI, India, March 25 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 20: 1. The instant appeal preferred under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, is directed against the order dated 17.12.2025 passed in Misc. Cri. Application No.2521 of 2025 (ATS Court Case-01/2024) by the learned Addl. Judicial CommissionerXVIII-cum-Special Judge CID/ATS, Ranchi, in connection with ATS P.S. Case No. 10 of 2023, registered for the offence under Sections 385/386/34 of the IPC a...
RANCHI, India, March 25 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 20: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The challenge in this appeal is to the impugned award dated 02.08.2016 to the extent it awards a meagre compensation of Rs. 4,11,000/- for the demise of Shyam Sunder Prasad, the claimants' husband/father, in a vehicular accident on 16.07.2013. 3. The learned counsel for the appellant firstly sought an adjournment in the matter, but when it was clarified that, a...
RANCHI, India, March 25 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 20: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This I.A. seeks condonation of delay of 110 days in instituting this Miscellaneous Appeal. We have perused the averments in the I.A. and we are satisfied that this delay has been sufficiently explained. 3. Accordingly, we condone the delay and disposed of this I.A. Miscellaneous Appeal No. 572 of 2019 4. At the request of and with the consent of the learned c...
RANCHI, India, March 25 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 20: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The appellant, who is the owner of the offending vehicle challenges the impugned judgment and award dated 26.07.2024 mainly on the ground that the Insurance Company should not have been absolved of its liability to indemnify the appellant. 3. The appellant succeeded in obtaining ad-interim relief from this Court on 13.10.2025 without depositing any amount. Beca...
RANCHI, India, March 25 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 20: 1. Heard Mr. Mukesh Kumar Dubey, the learned counsel for the appellant-Insurance Company, and Mr. Arvind Kumar Lall, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2 (claimants). 2. Mr Dubey, the learned counsel for the appellant, submits that the appellant-Insurance Company, has appealed the impugned award dated 22.02.2024 passed in M.A.C. Case No. 241 of 2020 only on one ground. He submits that the Trib...
GUWAHATI, India, March 24 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 20: 1. Heard Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner as well as Mr. B. Goswami, learned Addl. Advocate General for the State of Assam, assisted by Mr. N. Kalita, learned Government Advocate. Also heard Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned CGC, representing the Respondent no. 1. 2. The instant petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed praying for a writ in the ...
GUWAHATI, India, March 24 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 20: [1] Heard Mr. D. Rathi, the learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, the learned Standing Counsel, N.F. Railways. [2] This appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 has been filed by the appellant, Shri Gajendra Raut, impugning the judgment and order dated 14.08.2019, passed in Original Application No. I-42/2013(Old) by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Guwahati Bench, ...