SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: Heard Mr. S.A.Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Issue notice. Mrs. T.Yangi B. learned AAG assisted by Mr. E.R.Chyne, learned GA is present and accepts notice on behalf of all the respondents, as such, no further notice is required. List this matter on 04-05-2026 for instructions and affidavit. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: Heard learned counsels appearing for the parties at some length. Further hearing will continue on the next date. As prayed for, list this matter after 2 (two) weeks. Parties shall be at liberty to file written synopsis of their respective arguments. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. Heard Mr. M.F. Qureshi, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant, who has submitted that the applicant has filed an appeal before this Court, being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 17.10.2025 passed by the Court of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), South West Khasi Hills District, Mawkyrwat in Special (POCSO) Case No. 7 of 2023, wherein, he was di...
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. Records would show that an FIR dated 21.05.2014 was lodged by one Shri. Dorjee Wangdak informing the Officer-in-Charge of Lumdiengjri Police Station, Shillong of a Motor accident which occurred on 08.05.2014 at about 07:50 PM or so. 2. It is the narration of the informant that his brother Shri. Ngawang Gyaltsen, was returning home from Police Bazaar, Shillong riding his scooty bearing registrati...
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. Though Ms. M.L.Tlau, learned counsel for the petitioner has been at pains to satisfy this Court that the cause of action still survives, however, with the revocation of the status quo ante order by order dated 18-03-2026, passed by the Commissioner & Secretary, Education Department, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous, and as such is accordingly closed. 2. Matter accordingly ...
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. The brief facts of the case are that the writ petitioners herein numbering 45(forty-five), who were contractual Government Teachers, teaching in Lower Primary Schools were terminated on 15.12.2020, on not having the requisite qualification of Meghalaya Teachers Eligibility Test (MTET). 2. The grievance of the writ petitioners as projected in the writ petition is that after 2019, though the Gover...
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. The writ petitioner a registered Class-I Government contractor under the Public Works Department being aggrieved with the action of the respondent No. 5, in commencing the execution of a public road construction work for the "Improvement of the existing road including MBT of New Nongstoin to Nongstoin Village" including different link roads within Nongstoin in the month of October, 2024, without a...
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. This is an application filed by the applicant for impleading Shri. Sujin R.Sangma, Rev. Jack N. Sangma, Smti. Silme Ch. Marak and Shri. Teofield T. Sangma, as party respondents in the pending WP(C). No. 664 of 2025. 2. As the same is as per direction of this Court, the application is allowed and the persons named hereinabove shall be impleaded as respondents No. 4, 5, 6 & 7. 3. Registry to mak...
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: In view of the order passed in WP(C) No. 166 of 2025, this Misc. Case also stands disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
IMPHAL, India, May 11 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on April 9: Mr. Th. Khagemba, learned counsel representing the learned counsel on record for revision petitioner is before this Court (physical Court) and Ms. G. Pushpa, learned counsel representing the learned counsel on record for respondents is before this Court on the Video Conferencing (V.C.) platform. Both learned counsel request for rescheduling of the captioned matter citing difficulty/inconvenience for the counsel ...