PATNA, India, Sept. 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 13: No one appears on the behalf of the petitioner. 2. Show cause filed on behalf of Opposite Parties No. 1 to 5 dated 12.08.2025 read with Annexure-5, it is prima facie evident that encroachment has been removed. 3. Accordingly, present MJC stands dropped reserving liberty to the petitioner to the approach this Court, in the event of any incomplete removal of encroachment. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
PATNA, India, Sept. 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 13: Heard Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No. 2 as well as Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The present modification application has been filed for modifying the order dated 16.04.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 72012 of 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Court has directe...
PATNA, India, Sept. 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 13: The present criminal appeal has been preferred under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of acquittal dated 10.07.2023 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge- VI-cum-Special Judge (POCSO), Bhojpur in POCSO Case No. 08/2021, arising out of Mahila P.S. Case No. 09 of 2021, whereby Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have been acquitted from the charge of Sections 323, 342, 3...
PATNA, India, Sept. 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 13: The present criminal appeal has been preferred under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of acquittal dated 10.02.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge- VII, Bhojpur, Ara in Sessions Trial No. 52 of 2022, arising out of Tarari P.S. Case No. 108 of 2020, whereby Respondent No. 2 has been acquitted by the trial court from the charge of Sections 304B and 201/34 of the ...
PATNA, India, Sept. 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 13: Heard Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh, learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 15 and Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, learned APP for the State. 2. The present criminal appeal has been preferred under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of acquittal dated 04.01.2023, passed by the learned District & Sessions Judge, West Champaran, Bettiah,...
PATNA, India, Sept. 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 13: No one appears on behalf of the appellant. 2. The present LPA is pending consideration for last about 8 years. 3. The appellant has assailed the order of the learned Single Judge dated 11.10.2017 passed in CWJC No. 483 of 2016, which is a short order and it reads as under:- "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Ac...
PATNA, India, Sept. 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 13: Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The appellant has filed the instant appeal against the judgment and order dated 6.3.2024 whereby the learned Single Judge was pleased to dispose of the writ application (CWJC no.3369 of 2011) directing the Bihar State Credit and Investment Corporation Limited ('BICICO' in short) to issue 'no dues' certificate in favour of the wr...
PATNA, India, Sept. 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 13: On 25.06.2025, we have passed the following order:- "Learned counsel for the Respondent-State Mr. Anil Kumar Verma seeks time stating that he does not possess Writ petition copy. We have come across in number of L.P.As., where the State counsels are appearing without Writ petition copy. It is deprecated. 2. Copy of this order shall be communicated to the office of the Advocate General, Bihar and the Chief Sec...
PATNA, India, Sept. 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 13: Heard the parties. 2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 19(1)(1-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1984 impugning the judgment and decree dated 21.08.2020 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Purnea in Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No. 203 of 2018, whereby the petition, filed by the appellant-wife to nullify the marriage with the respondent-husband solemnized on 06.02.2016, has been dismissed...
PATNA, India, Sept. 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 12: The record taken up on mentioning being made on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and I intend to dispose of the present petition at the stage of admission itself. 3. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 08.01.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mahnar, Vaishali in Title Suit No. 49/1984 whereby and whereunder the learned trial court allo...