NAINITAL, India, Feb. 3 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 05TH JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2515 of 2025 Harendra alias Bittu Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate, with Mrs. Gyan Mati Kushwaha, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Tumul Nainwal, Assistant Government Advocate. Hon'ble Alok...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. Heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel representing the appellants. Also heard Mr. M. Ahmed and Mr. N.J. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. These batch of applications are under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act challenging the judgment and award dated 21.09.2020 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.1, Kamrup (M) in MAC Case Nos.156/2017 & 157/2017. 3. The claimants Uttam...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. Heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel representing the appellants. Also heard Mr. M. Ahmed and Mr. N.J. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. These batch of applications are under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act challenging the judgment and award dated 21.09.2020 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.1, Kamrup (M) in MAC Case Nos.156/2017 & 157/2017. 3. The claimants Uttam...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 3 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 05TH JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2201 of 2025 Harendra alias Bittu Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate, with Mrs. Gyan Mati Kushwaha, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Tumul Nainwal, Assistant Government Advocate. Hon'ble Alok...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. Heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel representing the appellants. Also heard Mr. M. Ahmed and Mr. N.J. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. These batch of applications are under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act challenging the judgment and award dated 21.09.2020 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.1, Kamrup (M) in MAC Case Nos.156/2017 & 157/2017. 3. The claimants Uttam...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 3 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment Jan. 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 05th JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2082 of 2025 Afzal Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate (through video conferencing). Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Tumul Nainwal, Assistant Government Advocate. Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. Applicant...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. Heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel representing the appellants. Also heard Mr. M. Ahmed and Mr. N.J. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. These batch of applications are under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act challenging the judgment and award dated 21.09.2020 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.1, Kamrup (M) in MAC Case Nos.156/2017 & 157/2017. 3. The claimants Uttam...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 3 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment Jan. 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 05TH JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2024 of 2025 Harendra alias Bittu Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate, with Mrs. Gyan Mati Kushwaha, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Tumul Nainwal, Assistant Government Advocate. Hon'ble Alok Ku...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. Heard Mr. K. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. D. Rathi, the learned counsel representing the respondent. 2. This is an appeal under Section 23 of the of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenging the judgment and order dated 29.11.2023 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Guwahati Bench in O.A. No.III/96/2015. 3. On 03.11.2014, 23.11.2014 and 23.12.2014, consign...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. Heard Mrs. U. Chakraborty, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. Also heard Ms. M. Sarma, the learned counsel representing the respondent. 2. This is an appeal under Section 23 of the of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenging the judgment and order dated 27.06.2014 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Guwahati Bench in O.A. No.1362 of 2007. 3. The respondent filed the application unde...