AGARTALA, India, April 18 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on March 17: 1. Heard Learned Sr. counsel Mr. Purusuttam Roy Barman, assisted by Mr. Samarjit Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and also heard learned Addl. GA Mr. Mangal Debbarma, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. 2. The petitioner has filed this present writ petition seeking the following reliefs:- " (i) Issue Rule NISI upon the Respondents to show cause why a...
AGARTALA, India, April 18 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on March 17: Heard Mr. Dhruba Jyoti Saha, learned counsel for the applicants, has prayed for modification of the order dated 11.02.2026, whereby a scope was given to the said applicants to submit the counter-affidavit, subject to payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees two thousand) only to be deposited in favour of High Court Employees' Welfare Fund Committee, High Court of Tripura. Learned counsel, Mr. Dhruba ...
AGARTALA, India, April 18 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on March 17: Heard This present application has been filed under Chapter VIII Rule A3(g) of the High Court Rules for passing an interim order staying the operation of the order dated 26.09.2025 passed in WP(C) No.285 of 2024 till disposal of the writ appeal. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and having gone through the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this Court is of the considered op...
AGARTALA, India, April 18 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on March 17: [1] When the case is called, Mr. Karnajit De, learned Addl. G.A. appears for the appellants (respondents of the writ petition) and Ms. Rajasree Purkayastha, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent-writ petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the writ petitioner). [2] The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 16.05.2025 passed in WP(C) No.64 of 2024 whereby the...
AGARTALA, India, April 18 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on March 17: [1] Heard Mr. J. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the appellant also heard Mr. R. Datta, learned P.P. appearing for the respondentState. [2] This is an appeal filed under Section-374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 21.09.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge (NDPS), Dhalai Judicial District, Ambassa in conne...
AGARTALA, India, April 18 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on March 17: At the request of Learned P.P. appearing for the State, list this matter on 18.03.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GANGTOK, India, April 18 -- Sikkim High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 17: 1. The present Criminal Appeal, filed by the appellants are directed against the judgment and order dated 13.09.1994 passed by the learned CJM-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge, Baripada in Sessions Trial Case No.8/43 of 1994, whereby the appellant No.1 has been convicted for the offences under Sections 366/376 of I.P.C. and the appellant No.2 has been convicted for the offence under Section 366 of I.P.C. ...
GANGTOK, India, April 18 -- Sikkim High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 17: 1. The present appeal has been preferred by the convicts assailing the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 27.12.2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Patnagarh in Sessions Case No. 68/15 of 2008 (Arising out of G.R.354 of 2006 of the Court of S.D.J.M., Patnagarh), whereby the learned Trial Court, while acquitting the accused persons of the charges under Section...
CUTTACK, India, April 18 -- Orissa High Court issued the following order on March 17: 1. The seminal point involved in the instant writ petition pertains to the Demand Notice dated 9th June, 2025 issued by the Mining Officer, Nuapada (opposite party No.7) vide Annexure-1 upon the petitioner claiming the outstanding dues for the Financial Years 2022-23 to 2025-26 towards the Royalty and other dues as the quarry operation remained idle for more than a continuous period of six months which is viol...
CUTTACK, India, April 18 -- Orissa High Court issued the following order on March 17: 1. This 2 nd appeal has been preferred against the confirming judgment. 2. The predecessor of the appellants in this 2nd appeal, i.e., Naresh Prasad Saha, was the sole plaintiff before the learned trial court in the suit vide C.S. No.290 of 2005 and after the death of Naresh Prasad Saha his legal heirs preferred the 1 st appeal vide RFA No.16 of 2018 being the appellants. The parents of the respondents in th...