RANCHI, India, April 15 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. The tax effect in this appeal is admittedly below Rs. 2 crores. However, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, learned counsel for the appellant, states that he has no instructions to withdraw this appeal. 3. Accordingly, we dispose of this appeal on the grounds of low tax effect by keeping open the questions of law. 4. However, at the later stage, if the appellant finds tha...
RANCHI, India, April 15 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The tax effect in these appeals is admittedly below Rs. 2 crores. However, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, learned counsel for the appellant/s, states that he has no instructions to withdraw these appeals. 3. Accordingly, we dispose of these appeals on the grounds of low tax effect by keeping open the questions of law. 4. However, at the later stage, if the appellant/s f...
RANCHI, India, April 15 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 13: Heard Mr. Aditya Kr. Jha, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. This appeal is directed against the order dated 20.11.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Dhanbad in B.P. No. 954/2025 in connection with Dhanbad G.R. P.S. Case No. 104/2025, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that the Police had recovered two mi...
GUWAHATI, India, April 15 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Heard Mr. A. H. Algamgir, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. M. P. Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam. Facts:- 2. The fact of the instant case starts with lodging of an Ejahar on 11.06.2012 by the father of the victim, wherein it is alleged inter alia that ten years back, his daughter was married of to one Nasiruddin, who died and from the said wedlock, the victim had two children....
GUWAHATI, India, April 15 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Heard Mr. D K Dey, learned counsel for the appellant and Ms. M Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This is an appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act 1987, preferred by NF Railways, challenging the judgment and award dated 10-05-2016 passed by the Learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Guwahati Bench, Guwahati in Claim Application O.A No. 5/2010 (Old) & O.A No-I/Guwahati/2010/000...
GUWAHATI, India, April 15 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Heard Mr. P Hazarika, learned counsel for the appellant and Ms. S Roy, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 Insurance Company. None appears for the remaining respondents i.e. the owner and driver of the offending vehicle. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment & award dated 06.03.2017 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No. 1, Kamrup in MAC Case No. 1747/2011, where...
GUWAHATI, India, April 15 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Heard Mr. B. D. Das, learned senior counsel for the appellant/claimant, and Mr. T. Kalita, learned counsel for the respondent No.1, Insurance Company. 2. The instant appeal challenges the Judgment and Award dated 10.01.2018 passed by the learned Member, M.A.C.T., Barpeta in MAC case No. 875 of 2015. 3. The facts of the case may be briefly recounted. 4. One Ananta Deka, son of Fulen Deka has filed a ...
GUWAHATI, India, April 15 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Heard Mr. H Das learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. R C Paul, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, Insurance Company. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment & order dated 24.09.2013 in MAC Case No. 73/2007 passed by the learned Member Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Goalpara awarding the compensation to your appellants Rs. 3,80,000/- (Rupees three lakhs eighty thousand) only with 50%...
GUWAHATI, India, April 15 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioners in the instant batch of writ petitions. Mr. S. Dutta, the learned Standing Counsel of the Panchayat and Rural Development Department who appears for the said Department and Mr. J. Handique, the learned Government Advocate who appears on behalf of the District Administration. I have also heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the ...
GUWAHATI, India, April 15 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioners in the instant batch of writ petitions. Mr. S. Dutta, the learned Standing Counsel of the Panchayat and Rural Development Department who appears for the said Department and Mr. J. Handique, the learned Government Advocate who appears on behalf of the District Administration. I have also heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the ...