RANCHI, India, Dec. 20 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 20: Heard the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this criminal miscellaneous petition as the connected case has been disposed of by the learned trial court. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The interim relief granted earlier vide order dated 14.01.2020 is vacated. Registry is dire...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 20 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 20: Heard the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this criminal miscellaneous petition. This criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Dec. 20 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 20: Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Cr.M.P. as the prayer made in this Cr.M.P. has become infructuous. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Dec. 20 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 20: No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that since there is no merit in this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, hence, the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Dec. 20 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 20: Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition as the petitioner has been acquitted in the connected case. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Dec. 20 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 20: Heard the parties. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition with liberty to raise all grounds taken in this Cr.M.P. at appropriate stage before the appropriate Court. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid l...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 20 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 20: No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that since there is not merit in this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, hence, the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Dec. 20 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 20: 1) Defect, as pointed out by the registry, has been removed by filing court fee of Rs. 230/-. 2) Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous with efflux of time. 3) Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Dec. 20 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 20: There appears to be a typographical error in paragraph 41 of the judgment dated 30th October 2025, inasmuch, instead of the year '2009', it has wrongly been mentioned as '2019', in the description given for W.P. (L) No.1716 of 2009. Paragraph 41 of the judgment dated 30th October 2025 be rectified to that extent. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Dec. 20 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 20: There appears to be a typographical error in paragraph 41 of the judgment dated 30th October 2025, inasmuch, instead of the year '2009', it has wrongly been mentioned as '2019', in the description given for W.P. (L) No.1716 of 2009. Paragraph 41 of the judgment dated 30th October 2025 be rectified to that extent. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....