JABALPUR, India, Sept. 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 28: Learned counsel for the parties agree that the facts of the case of petitioners is similar to the case of petitioners in Writ Petition No.6159/2022. It is conceded that by judgment dated 26.04.2022, Writ Petition No.6159/2022 has been disposed of issuing certain directions, which would be squarely applicable to the case of petitioners who, as per the petitioners, are identically situated. In...
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 28: In view of para 36 of order dated 22.8.2025 in Suo Moto Writ Petition (Civil) No.5/2025, which reads as under: 36. We are also informed that numerous writ petitions/suo moto petitions are pending in various High Courts, more or less dealing with common issues. Hence, the Registry shall seek information about such pending writ petitions from the Registrar Generals of all the High Courts, and ...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 28: 1. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The instant second appeal is preferred against the judgment of affirmance, whereby and whereunder, the suit filed by the plaintiff has been dismissed by learned Trial Court and the First Appellate Court has also dismissed the appeal. 3. The appellant/plaintiff instituted Title Suit No.14 of 1990 for dec...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 28: 1. I have already heard the arguments advanced by Mr. Kundan Kr. Ambastha, learned counsel appearing for the appellants as well as Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. Instant second appeal has been preferred by original appellant Jewel Oraon (since deceased) and represented through legal representatives being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree d...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 28: 1. The matter relates to Sessions Trial No.06/2023, pending in the Court of the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XV-cum-FTC (CAW)-cumSpecial Court elected for MP/MLA-cum-Special Judge for Electricity Cases, Ranchi. 2. Mr. Ritesh Verma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on instruction of Mr. Anurag Kashyap, who is Advocate-on-Record, seeks permission to withdraw this petition. 3. Mr. Bho...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 28: I.A. No. 11285 of 2025 Heard Ms. Diksha Rani, the learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, the learned A.P.P. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning a delay of 18 days in filing the appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in this application, the delay of 18 days which had occurred in filing this appeal is condoned and this I.A. is al...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 28: Since both these appeals arise from a common FIR, these are being disposed of by this common order. Heard Mr. Gautam Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant in Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 912 of 2025 & Mr. Pratiush Lala, learned counsel appearing for the appellant in Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 972 of 2025 and Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned P.P. appearing for the State. Both these appeals are directed against the ord...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 28: I.A. No. 8482 of 2024 1. For the reasons stated in this Interlocutory Application, which is duly supported by an affidavit filed by the appellant, we find sufficient cause to condone the delay of 28 days that has crept up in filing the Appeal. 2. Accordingly, the aforesaid delay is condoned. This Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. L.P.A. No. 605 of 2023 3. With the consent of the parties, t...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 28: Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw this application. Mr. V. P. Singh, learned senior counsel for the respondent does not have any objection. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Pending I.A., if any also stands closed. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Sept. 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 28: I.A. No. 2142 of 2025 1) For the reasons stated in the application duly supported by the affidavit of the appellant, we find sufficient cause to condone the delay of 146 days' that has crept up in filing the appeal. 2) Accordingly, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned and I.A. No. 2142 of 2025 stands disposed of. L.P.A. No. 116 of 2025 3) Learned counsel for the appellant states that he may be pe...