RANCHI, India, Sept. 25 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. Since Similar issues are involved in both the Writ Petitions as such both the writ petitions have been heard together and disposed of by this Common order. Both these writ petitions have been filed for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing the demand notice dated 14.09.2009 as contained in letter Nos.2705 (W.P.(C) 1666 of 2011) and 2703(W.P.(C) 1685of 2011). 2. For the sake of ...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 25 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs; (a) For issuance of an appropriate writ or a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents specially respondent no. 3 to pay benefits of 6th pay revision with effect from 01.01.2006 which was allowed to the other similarly situated employees of the Ranchi Uni...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 25 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for a direction commanding upon the respondents to consider his case for appointment on the post of Graduate Trained (PGT) Teacher in +2 Schools of the State of Jharkhand in the subject Sanskrit under most backward caste (MBC) category pursuant to Advertisement No.74/2011 dated 23.07.2011. ...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 25 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 28.11.2017 passed by the respondent no.2 in Revision Case No.69/2016, by which, revision application of the petitioner has been dismissed and further a direction be issued to respondent no.3 to extend the period of lease of the petitioner from 5 years to 10 years. 2. The brief facts of the case, a...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 25 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for quashing of the order dated 3/4.10.2019; whereby the respondents started the departmental enquiry against the petitioner; further for the stay of the entire departmental proceeding initiated against the petitioner, inasmuch as, for the same set of charge; one R.C Case No. 3 (A)/...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 25 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. This Criminal Appeal has been filed on behalf of the appellants challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 25.01.2007 passed by Sri G.K. Varma, learned Sessions Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj in Sessions Trial No. 65 of 2004 whereby and whereunder the appellants namely, Radhey Shyam Mishra, Nagina Mishra, Subhago Devi @ Subhaga Devi, Sandhya Devi @ Sabya and Nevita @ Babita Kumari have been co...
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 25 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 25: After some arguments, learned counsel for appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 25 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 25: None appears for the appellant despite pass over. Appeal is dismissed in default. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 25 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 25: Learned counsel for appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal reserving the right of appellant to initiate appropriate proceedings for delay in conduct of departmental enquiry and for revocation of suspension on account of delay. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 25 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 25: Petitioner has filed the subject petition contending that petitioner was the highest bidder in the tender for award of vehicle parking recovery work and despite the highest bidder, contract has not been awarded to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that on 11.07.2025, the competent authority has decided to cancel the tender for the reason that a very low bid was receiv...