RANCHI, India, Feb. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. The instant petition has been filed for the following reliefs: "(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction, including Writ of Mandamus, directing Respondent authorities more particularly Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to process applications of petitioner for grant of Subsidy/Incentive pertaining to reimbursement of State GST in terms of Clause 7.5 of the Jharkhand Industrial Investment and Promotion P...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner, in this writ petition, has prayed for the following reliefs:- I. For issuance of appropriate Writ (s)/ Order (s)/Direction (s), particularly a Writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing of the order contained in memo no. 1405 (S) dated 13th April, 2021(Annexure No. 11), as the same is a non-speaking ord...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. None appears for the petitioner. However, Mr. Shubham Mishra, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah, learned counsel for the private respondent are present. 2. From record, it appears that after filing of the writ application, the petitioner has never appeared except once. 3. Looking to the prayer made in this writ application, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in this case,...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. In this writ application the petitioner prays for the following reliefs: a. For issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions or writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the notification bearing No. 119(S), dated 06.01.2011 [ANNEXURE-4], issued by the Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi through its Deputy Sec...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 7 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 7: 1. Heard learned counsel, Mr. R. Goswami for the appellant/Insurer. Also heard learned counsel Mr. M. Khan for respondent Nos.1 & 2/claimants, and learned counselMr. S. K. Poddar for respondent No. 3(owner). 2. The MAC appeal No.385/2016 and CO No. 6/2024 are decided through this common judgment as both the analogous cases arise out of the same cause of action. The claimants in this case are M. Anowara Begum a...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 7 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 7: 1. Heard Mr. M.J. Quadir, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. N. Haque, learned counsel for the sole respondent. 2. This is an appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 25.06.2025 passed by the Learned Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Hailakandi, in T.A. No. 09/2025, whereby the judgment & decree passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Haila...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 7 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 7: 1. Heard Mr. A.M. Khan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. S. S. Roy, the learned CGC, who appears on behalf of the respondents. 2. The present writ proceeding is filed challenging the opinion rendered by the Review Medical Examination Board-2 of the CentreCAPFs, CH BSF, Patgaon wherein it was opined that the petitioner is unfit. 3. The materials on record show that in pursuanc...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 7 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 7: 1. Heard Mr. U. Dutta, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner herein has approached this Court seeking appropriate directions upon the respondents thereby to provide benefits to Apprentices under the Apprentices Act, 1961, and more particularly, taking into account the observations of the Supreme Court in the case of U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and Another vs. U....
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 7 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 7: 1. Heard Mr. A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Government Advocate for the State respondents and Mr. B. Deka, learned CGC for the Union of India. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner who claims to be the brother of one Ratan Narzary, who was killed in an encounter with the police authorities on 28.12.2016. The prayers, which have been ...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 7 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 7: 1. Heard Shri JK Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Shri S. Hoque, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1. 2. Considering the issue involved, the presence of respondent no.2 for adjudication of this proceeding may not be necessary. This Court has also noted that pursuant to earlier orders passed by this Court, the records of the learned Assam State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...