GUWAHATI, India, July 28 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on June 27: 1. The petitioner, M/s Carbon Resources Pvt. Ltd. has preferred these six writ petitions - W.P.[C] no. 388/2023, W.P.[C] no. 412/2023, W.P.[C] no. 413/2023, W.P.[C] no. 414/2023, W.P.[C] no. 415/2023 and W.P.[C] no. 416/2023 - under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail six different Orders, all dated 07.11.2022, passed by the Commissioner of Taxes, Assam [the respondent no. 2]. 2. For the purpo...
GUWAHATI, India, July 28 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on June 27: 1. The petitioner, M/s Carbon Resources Pvt. Ltd. has preferred these six writ petitions - W.P.[C] no. 388/2023, W.P.[C] no. 412/2023, W.P.[C] no. 413/2023, W.P.[C] no. 414/2023, W.P.[C] no. 415/2023 and W.P.[C] no. 416/2023 - under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail six different Orders, all dated 07.11.2022, passed by the Commissioner of Taxes, Assam [the respondent no. 2]. 2. For the purpo...
GUWAHATI, India, July 28 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on June 27: 1. Heard Mr. M.H. Choudhury, learned senior counsel representing the appellants as well as Mr. S.P. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. This is a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) whereby the judgment and decree dated 15.05.2010 passed by the court of learned District Judge, Hailakandi in Title Suit No.21/2006 is under challenge. 3. Late Irf...
India, July 28 -- In a world where inflation quietly tightens its grip and digital convenience has made it dangerously easy to overspend, online shoppers are waking up. They are browsing smarter, comparing harder, and — more than ever — seeking out ways to save without sacrificing what they love to buy. A new breed of consumers is emerging: aware, deliberate, and price-conscious. The modern shopper doesn’t just want a product — they want value. In the Middle East, particularly in countries such...
GUWAHATI, India, July 28 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on June 27: 1. Heard Mr. M.H. Choudhury, learned senior counsel representing the appellants as well as Mr. S.P. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. This is a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) whereby the judgment and decree dated 15.05.2010 passed by the court of learned District Judge, Hailakandi in Title Suit No.21/2006 is under challenge. 3. Late Irf...
GUWAHATI, India, July 28 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on June 27: 1. Heard Mr. M.H. Choudhury, learned senior counsel representing the appellants as well as Mr. S.P. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. This is a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) whereby the judgment and decree dated 15.05.2010 passed by the court of learned District Judge, Hailakandi in Title Suit No.21/2006 is under challenge. 3. Late Irf...
RANCHI, India, July 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 30: 1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed for withdrawal of First Appeal No.30 of 2023. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants has submitted that in view of the present interlocutory application, he may be allowed to withdraw First Appeal No.30 of 2023. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has raised no objection to the same. 4. Permission, as prayed for, is gra...
RANCHI, India, July 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 30: 1. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that he is not pressing the instant interlocutory application since the document which has been sought for by way of additional evidence in view of the application filed under Order 41 Rule 27 of the CPC has been exhibited and considered by the learned Family Judge and in that view of the matter, the instant application is not being pressed. 2. Accordingly, ...
RANCHI, India, July 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 30: 1. I.A. No.10147 of 2019 has been filed for condonation of delay of 12 days in filing the present miscellaneous appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in preparation of file, such delay has occurred. 3. For the reasons assigned in the said I.A, the Court finds that sufficient ground is made out to condone the delay and, as such, the delay of 12 days in filing the present miscellaneous ap...
RANCHI, India, July 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 30: 1) This application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to condone the delay of 266 days in filing the Letters Patent Appeal challenging the judgment dt. 02.01.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 890 of 2018. 2) In the application filed for condonation of delay, it is stated that the file was put up before the Assistant director (Law Cell) for taking further steps in the m...