NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 13.09.2024 cancelling the GST registration of the petitioner on the ground that he had failed to file the returns within prescribed period. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in identical facts and circumstances in WPMB No.39 of 2025 a Co-ordinate Bench has permitted the petitioner therein to file application for revocation of the c...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. 1. Heard Shri Tarun Pande, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Pooja Banga, learned counsel for the respondents-State. 2. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 27.08.2024 passed by respondent no.2 under Section 73 (9) of the C.G.S.T Act/UKGST Act, demanding tax of Rs.9,58,343.12/-, along with penalty of Rs. 95,834.3/-, total sum of Rs. 10,54,177.42/-. 3. The case of the petiti...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 05.09.2024 cancelling the GST registration of the petitioner firm on the ground that it had failed to file the returns within prescribed period. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in identical facts and circumstances in WPMB No.39 of 2025 a Co-ordinate Bench has permitted the petitioner therein to file application for revocation of ...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 08.08.2025 cancelling the GST registration of the petitioner on the ground that he had failed to file the returns within prescribed period. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in identical facts and circumstances in WPMB No.39 of 2025 a Co-ordinate Bench has permitted the petitioner therein to file application for revocation of the c...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 30.05.2024 cancelling the GST registration of the petitioner on the ground that he had failed to file the returns within prescribed period. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in identical facts and circumstances in WPMB No.39 of 2025 a Co-ordinate Bench has permitted the petitioner therein to file application for revocation of the c...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. The appeal from order No.505 of 2011 has been preferred by the State of Uttarakhand under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, assailing the judgment and award dated 27.10.2010 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 102 of 2006 Umesh Chandra Pandey Vs. U.P. Seeds and Tarai Vikas Nigam and Ors.,...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. The appeal from order No.505 of 2011 has been preferred by the State of Uttarakhand under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, assailing the judgment and award dated 27.10.2010 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 102 of 2006 Umesh Chandra Pandey Vs. U.P. Seeds and Tarai Vikas Nigam and Ors.,...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and award dated 21.04.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, whereby compensation to the tune of Rs.18,18,872/- along with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of claim petition till actual payment was made, was awarded in favour of the claimants on account of the death of Rajkumar, who succumbed to injuries sustained in a motor veh...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. The appeal from order No.505 of 2011 has been preferred by the State of Uttarakhand under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, assailing the judgment and award dated 27.10.2010 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 102 of 2006 Umesh Chandra Pandey Vs. U.P. Seeds and Tarai Vikas Nigam and Ors.,...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. Since the FIR from which these appeals arose is one and the same and the offence alleged against them is also similar, hence both these appeals are taken up together and decided by this common judgment. 2. CRLA No.284/2025 is directed against the judgment and order dated 20.03.2025, passed by learned Special Judge (UAP Act)/Second Additional Sessions Judge, Haldwani, District Nainital in FIR...