AGARTALA, India, March 4 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 2: This is an application filed under proviso to section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for condoning the delay of 1140 days in preferring the appeal against the impugned order dated 31.03.2022 passed in L.A.(Ref) 150 of 2019 by the learned LA Judge, South Tripura, Belonia. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. After perusal of the contentions made in the petition for condonation of delay, t...
AGARTALA, India, March 4 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 2: This is an application filed under proviso to section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for condoning the delay of 1162 days in preferring the appeal against the impugned order dated 27.04.2021 passed in L.A.(Ref) 142 of 2019 by the learned LA Judge, South Tripura, Belonia. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. After perusal of the contentions made in the petition for condonation of delay, t...
PATNA, India, March 4 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 2: 1. I.A. No. 2 of 2025 is an application for condonation of delay. The Stamp Reporter has pointed out that there is delay of 89 days in filing this LPA. 2. Issue notice to the respondent nos. 1 to 23, on the question of limitation under both process, i.e., ordinary as well as registered post with A.D., for which necessary requisites must be filed within a period of three weeks from today. 3. List this matter on 2...
AGARTALA, India, March 4 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 2: Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellants are not pressing this appeal. The appeal is accordingly disposed of as not pressed. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
PATNA, India, March 4 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 2: 1. From perusal of the Office Notes dated 28.01.2026, it appears that vide Court's order dated 04.12.2025, Office was directed to send a express reminder to the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division)-III-cum-L.A. Special-III Judge, Civil Court, Patna to send the transmission of Exhibits 1 to 1/D and Exhibits A and B of Land Acquisition Case No.24 of 2002. 2. Accordingly, a letter with this regard has been sent by lear...
AGARTALA, India, March 4 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 2: [1] Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned Sr. Counsel assisted by Mr. Kawsik Nath, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner. [2] Also heard Mr. A. Chakraborty, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.5 & 6. [3] Mr. P. Gautam, learned senior GA has appeared for the respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3. [4] The petitioner is a widow-daughter of late Birendra Chandra Karmakar who was working under the ...
PATNA, India, March 4 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 2: 1. No one appears on behalf of the appellants, whereas learned counsel for the Respondent is present. 2. List this case on 16.02.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
AGARTALA, India, March 4 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 2: [1] Heard Ld. Counsel of both sides. [2] The case, as a chequered history, is that the petitioner as a Rifleman (GD), entered into the service on 23.04.1985 under respondent nos. 1 and 2. Initially, on entering into service, he filled in Attestation form, Personal Data form, GIS nomination form & GPF nomination form and DCRG nomination form on different occasions, mentioning the name of his wife as ...
PATNA, India, March 4 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 2: 1. No one appears on behalf of both the parties. 2. List this case on 19.02.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
PATNA, India, March 4 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 2: 1. No one appears on behalf of the parties. 2. From perusal of the records, it appears that on several dates, i.e., on 13.11.2025 and 12.01.2026 and today also, nobody appears on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned counsel for the respondent. It also appears that on several occasions, i.e., on 01.09.2025, 13.10.2025, 27.11.2025, learned counsel for the appellant sought some adjournme...