RANCHI, India, Sept. 30 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 29: 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this case. 2. Learned counsel for the opposite party has raised no objection. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Hence, this Civil revision is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Sept. 30 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 29: 1. I.A. No.10618 of 2023 has been filed for condonation of delay of 389 days in filing the present criminal revision petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was unaware of the proceeding against him and in view of that, such delay has occurred and, as such, the delay may kindly be condoned. 3. Learned counsel for the State and opposite party no.2 have got no serious obj...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 30 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 29: 1. This matter relates to MCA No.1933 of 2024 in ST Case No.279 of 2024 (arising out of Dhanbad Mahila P.S. Case No.30 of 2023, corresponding to G.R. Case No.682 of 2023), pending in the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-X, Dhanbad. 2. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Saw, learned counsel for the petitioner on instruction seeks permission to withdraw this criminal revision petition. 3. Learned counsel for th...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 30 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 29: 1. This matter is fixed by the Hon'ble The Chief Justice as mentioning was made before that Court. 2. When this matter was taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this matter may kindly be taken up after a week. 3. Let this matter appear after a week. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Sept. 30 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 29: 1. This criminal revision application has been directed against the judgment dated 18.12.2024 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Hazaribag in Criminal Appeal No.58 of 2024 whereby learned court has been pleased to dismiss the appeal and affirm the order of conviction and sentence dated 22.7.2024 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hazaribag in connection with Complaint Case No.156 of 2021, T.R. ...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 30 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 29: 1. Heard Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Kalyan Banerjee, learned counsel for the informant-opposite party no.2. 2. This criminal revision has been preferred for setting-aside the order dated 02.12.2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gumla in M.C.A. No.1594/2024, arising out of Ghaghra P.S. Case...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 30 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 29: 1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed under Section 430(1) of the BNSS, 2023 for keeping the sentence in abeyance in connection with the judgment of conviction dated 19.12.2022 and order of sentence dated 20.12.2022 passed by the Special Judge-POCSO Act, Dhanbad, in connection with Spl. (POCSO) Case No.61 of 2020 arising out of Saraidhela P.S Case No. 139 of 2020, whereby and whereunder, the...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 30 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 29: 1. 1. The instant Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is directed against the Judgment/Order dated 23.07.2015, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 1593 of 2001 by this Court, whereby and whereunder the prayer made in batch of the writ petitions has been dismissed in the light of the judgment passed in C.W.J.C No. 2758 of 2000(R) with analogous cases. 2. The order impugned in present appeal is one...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 30 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 29: On repeated calls, nobody has appeared on behalf of the appellant. Accordingly, the instant Misc. Appeal stands dismissed for nonprosecution. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Sept. 30 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 29: 1. The Objectors/ Appellants are before this Court in appeal against the grant of probate of WILL in Original Case No. 01 of 2013 which was converted to a testamentary suit on contest. 2. Relations are not in dispute that the Objector-Punit Gope is the son of Testator-Rewat Gope and Rukiaya Devi, whereas the legatee-Girdhari Yadav/respondent no. 1 is the maternal grandson (Nati) of the Testator. 3. Petitio...