JABALPUR, India, Sept. 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 25: Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to approach the writ court by way of a review petition. In view of the above, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 25: Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has been directed to submit a representation and it has been directed that the representation of the appellant be decided within 30 days of appellant joining the place of posting. Learned counsel further submits that in identical circumstances in Writ Petition No.24363/2025 by order dated 11.07.2025 it has been directed that the repr...
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 25: 1. Appellant impugns order dated 19.08.2025, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the minimum age prescribed for participating in the selection process of Primary School Selection Examination, 2025 has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though the Advertisement prescribes a minimum age of 21 years, however the advertisement is contrary t...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. The aforesaid appellants have preferred the present appeal through Jail Superintendent, Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan, Central Prison, Hazaribag through Letter No. 1741 dated 07.07.2004. 2. The appellants have been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life along with fine of Rs. 5,000/- with default stipulation for the offence under Section 302/34 of IPC by the First Additional Se...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: Heard the learned counsel for the respective sides. This appeal is directed against the order dated 31.07.2025 passed in A.B.P. No. 2020 of 2025 in connection with Putki P.S. Case No. 23 of 2024 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Dhanbad, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellant has been rejected. The allegation reveals that with respect to lifting of coal the dispu...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: Heard the learned counsel for the respective sides. This appeal is directed against the order dated 02.07.2025 passed in M.C.A. No. 1606 of 2025 arising out of S.T. Case No. 58 of 2025 (Haidernagar P.S. Case No. 52/2024 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Palamau at Daltonganj, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that some extremists ...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: Heard the learned counsel for the respective sides. This appeal is directed against the order dated 16.07.2025 passed in M.C.A. No. 1239 of 2025 arising out of Nimiyaghat P.S. Case No. 24/2019 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Giridih, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellants has been rejected. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellants that though...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: I.A. No. 10560 of 2025 Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning a delay of 16 days in filing the appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in this application, the delay of 16 days which had occurred in filing this appeal is condoned and this I.A. is allowed and disposed of. Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 948 of 202...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. Instant criminal appeal is preferred by above named appellant for setting aside his judgment of conviction dated 22.08.2001 and order of sentence dated 23.08.2001 passed by learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Gumla in S.T. No. 300/1995 whereby and wh...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. Affidavit filed by the State reveals that appellant No. 1 namely, Beni Singh and appellant no. 4 namely, Ram Nath Ram @ Ram Nath Rautiya have died during pendency of this appeal. 2. Therefore, the appeal, so far as appellant no. 1 namely, Beni Singh and appellant no. 4 namely, Ram Nath Ram @ Ram Nath Rautiya is concerned, stands abated. 3. Now, the appeal is heard with respect to appellant nos. 2, 3, 5...