GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 19 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 20: 1. Heard Mr. N. M. Dutta, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. B. Prashad, learned counsel for the respondent No.1. 2. In this appeal, under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the appellant, the National Insurance Company Limited, has challenged the correctness or otherwise of the judgment and award dated 07.07.2018, passed in MAC Case No. 2308/2014, by the learned Additional District Judge N...
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 19 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 20: 1. The present appeal petition under Section 173 of the MV Act, 1988 has been filed by the claimants/ appellants challenging the judgment and award dated 23.12.2013 passed by the MACT No. 3 Kamrup, Guwahati in MAC Appeal./1738/2009. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. K.K Dutta and learned counsel for the respondent No. 3/Insurer, Mr. R. Goswami. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant sub...
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 19 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 20: 1. We have heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. R. Ali, learned Advocate for the appellant; Mr. H.R.A. Choudhury, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. M. Alam Geer, learned Advocate for the respondent No.1 and Mr. K. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Education (Higher) Department for the respondent Nos.2 & 4. 2. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 05.05...
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 19 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 20: 1. Heard Mr. B. Rahman, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. S. Dutta, the learned Standing Counsel, P&RD Department appears on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 4; Mr. R. Talukdar, the learned Government Advocate appears on behalf of the respondent No. 2 and Mr. K. Kalita, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No. 5. 2. Mr. B. Rahman, the learned counsel appea...
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 19 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 20: 1. We have heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. R.M. Deka, learned Advocate for the petitioners and Ms. A. Gayan, learned Central Government Counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioners had applied for recruitment to the posts of House Keeping Staff and Mess Staff at the Air Force Hospital, Jorhat, pursuant to an advertisement dated 03.04.2021, issued by the respondents. The ...
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 19 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 20: 1] Heard Mr. K. N. Choudhury, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. R. Singha, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P. Nayak, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department, appearing for the respondent Nos.1 & 2, and Mr. P. P. Dutta, learned standing Counsel, APSC, for respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5. 2] By way of the instant two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitutio...
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 19 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 20: 1] Heard Mr. K. N. Choudhury, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. R. Singha, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P. Nayak, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department, appearing for the respondent Nos.1 & 2, and Mr. P. P. Dutta, learned standing Counsel, APSC, for respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5. 2] By way of the instant two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitutio...
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 19 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 20: 1. This appeal was admitted on the following substantial questions of law : (1) Whether the learned appellate Court was right in holding that the suit of the plaintiff is not maintainable? (2) Whether the learned appellate Court erred in law without formulating any point for determination or without discussing any evidence on record in the appeal in accordance with Order 41 Rule 31 of the Code of Civil Pr...
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 19 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 20: The appellant in this case is Sri Dharmeswar Saikia and the respondent No. 1 in this case are :- 1 (i) Sri Raja Beg, 1 (ii) Mrs. Farida Beg, 1 (iii) Mafida Beg Choudhury and 1 (iv) Wajzda Beg. 2. The respondent No. 2 at present are :- 2 (i) Smti Devina Begg and 2 (ii) Smti Mina Begg. 3. The respondent No. 3 is Musst. Elizabeth Beg. The respondent No. 4 are :- 4 (i) Somiul Begg, 4 (ii) Jomiu...
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 19 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 20: The appellant in this case is Sri Dharmeswar Saikia and the respondent No. 1 in this case are :- 1 (i) Sri Raja Beg, 1 (ii) Mrs. Farida Beg, 1 (iii) Mafida Beg Choudhury and 1 (iv) Wajzda Beg. 2. The respondent No. 2 at present are :- 2 (i) Smti Devina Begg and 2 (ii) Smti Mina Begg. 3. The respondent No. 3 is Musst. Elizabeth Beg. The respondent No. 4 are :- 4 (i) Somiul Begg, 4 (ii) Jomiu...