RANCHI, India, May 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 28: 1. Heard the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Sections 323, 306, 420, 120-B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. The petitioners are none but t...
NAINITAL, India, May 28 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order May 5: Learned State Counsel submits that the reliefs sought for in the instant writ petition have been answered; that encroachments have been identified and removed, and; construction of the road has already been completed. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. In view of the positive assertion made by learned State Counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as not surviving for conside...
RANCHI, India, May 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 28: 1. Heard the parties. 2. These anticipatory bail applications under Section 438 and 440 Cr.P.C. and under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, have been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Sections 3. The allegation against these petitioners is that they are the Directors of the Company in which the informant has given loan. It is furth...
NAINITAL, India, May 28 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order May 5: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause raised in the writ petition does not survive in view of the ruling of the Hon'ble Apex Court rendered in the case of Gaurav Kumar Vs. Union of India & Others reported in 2025 (1) SCC 641. 2. The submission is placed on record. 3. The writ petition (PIL) is disposed off as having been rendered infructuous. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
NAINITAL, India, May 28 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order May 5: We heard the petitioners who are present before the Court. It is submitted that the petitioners belong to different faith and that they intended to marry, and in order to register their marriage under the Special Marriage Act, a public notice in compliance with the requirement of the law was issued which resulted in a group of 30-40 individuals assembling before the house of the first petitioner and bri...
RANCHI, India, May 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 28: 1. The instant petition has been filed for modification of Para-5 of the order dated 25th January, 2025 passed in C.M.P. No. 217 of 2023, whereby and whereunder, this Court, while restoring the writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 7220 of 2019 has made restoration subject to compliance of order dated 17.06.2020 within a period of two weeks. 2. The matter had heard by this Court on 22nd April, 2025 wherein this Cou...
NAINITAL, India, May 28 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order May 5: A perusal of the pleadings would reveal that a Civil Suit, registered as OS No. 22/2012, is already pending on the file of the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Vikasnagar, Dehradun, wherein the Suit came to be decreed in favour of the petitioner; and that subsequently, on account of persistent violations of the injunction order, another Suit, being Civil Suit No. 18/2025 came to be filed before the...
RANCHI, India, May 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 28: 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Opposite party no.1. 2. Notice upon the rest of the Opposite parties have been made effective, however, they have chosen not to appear and the matter was adjourned further on 10.3.2025, and in view of that, this petition is being heard in absence of the other Opposite parties upon whom...
NAINITAL, India, May 28 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order May 5: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Brief Holder for the State, and the learned counsel for the second respondent. 2) Learned counsel for the State would submit that they have filed a compliance affidavit on 22.08.2024, and would also draw attention of this Court towards Annexure No. CA-3 to demonstrate the work undertaken to unclog the drains. 3) The learned counsel for the petitioner w...
RANCHI, India, May 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 28: 1. The notice upon the opposite parties have already been effected, however, nobody has appeared on behalf of the opposite parties and in view of that one more opportunity was provided to them and this matter was adjourned on 20.02.2025, in spite of that nobody has appeared on behalf of the opposite parties till date, as such this petition is being heard in absence of the opposite parties. 2. Heard Mr. Amar ...