RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: 1. The appellant-workman was a permanent employee of the respondent-company since 1974 and was made to retire on 1st July, 2010. According to the workman, he was wrongly made to retire as his date of birth had not been correctly reflected in the official record for which he had raised an industrial dispute. 2. The Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Jamshedpur adjudicated the dispute by answering the referen...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 28.04.2025 passed in W.P.(L) No. 3018 of 2012 whereby the writ petition filed by the petitioner/appellant has been dismissed and the award passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal no. 2, Dhanbad in Reference case no. 12 of 2006 has been affirmed. 2. The factual background of the case is that the respondent no. 1 namely Awinash Kuma...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: 1. Heard Mr. Harendra Kr. Mahato, learned counsel for the appellant and Mrs. Swati Shalini, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-CCL as well as Mr. Gaurav Raj, learned AC to AAG-II for the State. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 22.07.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 4208 of 2023, whereby and whereunder, the writ application preferred by the writ-petitioner/appel...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: I. A. No. 13548 of 2025: Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned P.P. for the State. This interlocutory application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 3 days in filing this appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 3 days in filing this appeal is hereby co...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: 1. Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. This criminal revision petition has been preferred for setting-aside the order dated 09.01.2025 passed by the learned A.J.C.-VIII-cum-Spl. Judge, NDPS, Ranchi in Misc. Criminal Application No.2974/2024 (arising out of NDPS Case No.56/2022, Tamar P.S. Case No.53/202...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. By order dated 23.06.2025, the State was directed to serve the notice upon the victim through the natural guardian/ father of the victim and the same has been served and affidavit to that effect has also been filed, in spite of that, nobody has appeared on behalf of the guardian of the victim. 3. This Criminal Revision has been...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: 1. The instant review petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking review, particularly, in the nature of modification of the order dated 12.06.2023 passed in W.P(C) No.1486 of 2023 by this Court to the effect that the representation which is to be filed has been referred to be filed before the respondent/O.P No.5, i.e., the Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply C...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: 1. Despite the case being called out repeatedly, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Accordingly, this Civil Review petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. 3. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stands disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: 1. Initially, this writ application was filed for quashing the Award dated 21.10.2005 in Ref. Case No. 174 of 2000. 2. During pendency of this writ application, the Management and the Workman entered into compromise settlement. Thereafter, several orders were passed, one of such orders is order dated 08.07.2025, which shows the history of the settlement and for brevity, order dated 08.07.2025 is extracted here...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 8: Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is under instructions not to press this W.P.(PIL). Accordingly, the instant W.P.(PIL) is dismissed as not pressed. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....