PATNA, India, Oct. 24 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Sept. 25: Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs: "i. For quashing the BSO/RO/2023/MDO/1044 letter no. dated 22.05.2023 issued by respondent no.4, whereby and where under on wrong assumption of facts, it has cancelled the candidature of the petitioner for RO Dealership ii. For quashing the letter dated 26.05.2023 by which the candidature of the ...
PATNA, India, Oct. 24 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Sept. 25: Core issue involved in the present lis is that 5th Respondent - Jyoti Devi has furnished residential certificate is a genuine or not? 2. One of the requirement for participation in the allotment of L.P.G. Distributorship is that candidate must be resident of that particular location. 5th Respondent has furnished certificate issued by the Revenue Authorities with reference to affidavit. 3. Learned counsel for ...
PATNA, India, Oct. 24 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Sept. 25: Heard the parties. 2. The appellant has come up in this appeal against judgment and decree dated 29.06.2019 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur in Matrimonial Case No. 12 of 2008, whereby the petition filed by the appellant under Sections 12 and 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short 'the 1955 Act') seeking dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce, has been dismissed. 3....
PATNA, India, Oct. 24 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Sept. 25: Heard. 2. The appellant has come up in this appeal against the order dated 09.10.2023 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali at Hajipur in Divorce Case No. 05 of 2021, whereby the petition filed by the appellanthusband under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short 'the 1955 Act') seeking dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce, has been dismissed. 3. The learned ...
PATNA, India, Oct. 24 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Sept. 25: Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. The appellant and the respondent are also physically present in the Court. 3. Pursuant to our earlier order dated 07.03.2025, an affidavited joint compromise petition duly signed by the both parties has been filed wherein the parties have entered into mutual understanding and have decided to part ways on the ...
PATNA, India, Oct. 24 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Sept. 25: Heard the parties. 2. The appellant has come up in this appeal against judgment dated 08.07.2011 and decree dated 21.07.2011 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali at Hajipur in O.S. Case No. 162 of 2010, whereby the petition filed by the respondent No. 1 under Section 27 of the Special Marriage Act, seeking dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce, has been allowed ex-parte. 3. T...
PATNA, India, Oct. 24 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Sept. 25: Heard. 2. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 25.10.2021 passed in Guardianship Case No. 09 of 2017 by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Katihar, whereby and whereunder the learned Court has dismissed the petition of the appellant filed under Section 7(1)(g) of the Family Court Act, 1984 for declaration of the appellant as the legal guardian of respondent No. 1 who is unmarried and ...
PATNA, India, Oct. 24 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Sept. 25: Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. All these three appeals have been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 14.10.1993 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned judgment) passed in Land Acquisition Case Nos. 08 of 1990, 07 of 1990 and 10 of 1990 passed by Sub-Judge 3rd , Patna (hereinafter referred to as the 'learned trial court') wherein and whereunder...
PATNA, India, Oct. 24 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Sept. 25: Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. All these three appeals have been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 14.10.1993 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned judgment) passed in Land Acquisition Case Nos. 08 of 1990, 07 of 1990 and 10 of 1990 passed by Sub-Judge 3rd , Patna (hereinafter referred to as the 'learned trial court') wherein and whereunder...
PATNA, India, Oct. 24 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Sept. 25: Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. All these three appeals have been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 14.10.1993 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned judgment) passed in Land Acquisition Case Nos. 08 of 1990, 07 of 1990 and 10 of 1990 passed by Sub-Judge 3rd , Patna (hereinafter referred to as the 'learned trial court') wherein and whereunder...