GUWAHATI, India, Jan. 16 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Dec. 16: 1. In this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, assail is made to a decision arrived at and given by the respondent no. 5 in connection with the election conducted on 30.06.2025 for the post of President of 39 Choudhury Bazar Gaon Panchayat within Binakandi Development Block and Hojai Zilla Parishad. The petitioner has challenged the decision to declare the respondent no. 7 a...
GUWAHATI, India, Jan. 16 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Dec. 16: 1. 8 nos. of petitioners have joined together in instituting the present challenge by filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India whereby challenge has been made to the first meeting of No.1 Mankachar Anchalik Panchayat, South Salmara- Mankachar dated 19.07.2025 wherein the President and Vice-President were elected. 2. As per the facts projected, the elections of the aforesaid Anc...
GUWAHATI, India, Jan. 16 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Dec. 16: 1. Heard Mr. M.R. Adhikari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Konwar, learned Addl. AG, Assam appearing for the State/ respondent and Mr. J. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 7. 2. The petitioner by way of the present application has assailed the decision of the State Level Committee (SLC) arrived at in its meeting held on 03-10-2019, towards rejecting his claim for ...
GUWAHATI, India, Jan. 16 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Dec. 16: 1. Heard Mr. D. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.J. Talukdar, learned Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. P.K. Medhi, learned counsel appearing for all the respondents. 2. The petitioner in the present proceeding has assailed a decision dated 06-12-2023 of the State Level Committee (SLC) in rejecting the claim of the petitioner, herein, for appointment on compassionate ground for want of ...
GUWAHATI, India, Jan. 16 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Dec. 16: 1. Heard Mr. F.A. Hassan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. A. Verma, learned standing counsel for the Foreigners Tribunal, Mr. A.I. Ali, learned standing counsel for the Election Commission of India, Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned CGC and Mr. P. Sarma, learned Addl. Senior Govt. Advocate. 2. By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged t...
GUWAHATI, India, Jan. 16 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Dec. 16: 1.. This appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of Law:- " whether the findings of the First Appellate Court are perverse on the face of the pleading and evidence of the plaintiff's witnesses." 2. The appellants in this case are (i) Nowshad Ali, (ii) Fuleshwari Bibi, (iii) Abul Hussain, and (iv) Jafar Sk, whereas, the respondents in this case are (i) Alep Uddin, (ii) Golap Uddin, and (iii)...
GUWAHATI, India, Jan. 16 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Dec. 16: 1. This appeal is preferred by the appellants Md. Mayar Uddin and Md Aftab Uddin. The respondents were initially Uday Shankar Das, Rabindra Chandra Das, Smt Jhunu Bala Das, Smt Shefali Rani Das, Smt Dipali Rani Das and the proforma respondents were initially Smt Pritibala Das, Smt Kusumanjali Das, Sri Nani Gopal Das who were arrayed as respondent Nos. 1 to 8 respectively. On death of respondent No. 1 Uday Sank...
NAINITAL, India, Jan. 16 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 2: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 2nd January 2026 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1284 OF 2025 Pradeep Kumar Sharma Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand and Another Respondents Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: Mr. Tumul Nainwal, Assistant Government Advocate Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J....
NAINITAL, India, Jan. 16 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgmen on Jan. 2: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 2nd January 2026 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1285 OF 2025 Pradeep Kumar Sharma Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand and Another Respondents Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: Mr. Tumul Nainwal, Assistant Government Advocate Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. ...
NAINITAL, India, Jan. 16 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 2: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 02nd January 2026 SECOND ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 42 of 2025 Sushil Kumar Ghod Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Gaurav Panwar, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Prabha Naithani, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, Assistant Government Advo...