RANCHI, India, April 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 17: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, April 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 17: Heard Mr. Jitendra S. Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and learned P.P. for the State. This appeal is directed against the order dated 15.01.2026 passed by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-VII-cum-Special Judge, CBI (AHD scam), Ranchi in A.B.P. No. 3585 of 2025, arising out of Ormanjhi P.S. Case No. 210 of 2025, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejec...
RANCHI, India, April 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 17: Pursuant to the order dated 12.03.2026 Mr. Dilip Kumar, Investigating Officer of Danda P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025 is physically present. He has submitted that the case diary has been updated and he has also apologized for not completing the case diary and he has undertaken that in future such mistake shall not be committed. In view of such undertaking the physical appearance of the Investigating Officer of...
RANCHI, India, April 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 17: 1. I.A No. 1797 of 2025 (in L.P.A No. 358 of 2025) has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to condone the delay of 145 days occurred in filing the present appeal. 2. I.A No. 6797 of 2025 (in L.P.A No. 719 of 2025) has been filed for condonation of delay of 93 days occurred in filing the present appeal. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the appellants and on being satisfied with the r...
RANCHI, India, April 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 17: 1. Heard Mr. Ashutosh Anand, learned A.A.G.-III for the appellants and Mr. Manoj Tandon, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 03.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 5508 of 2023, whereby and whereunder, the order contained in Memo No. 4190 dated 27.07.2023, by which, the writ-petitioners were transferred from the present pla...
RANCHI, India, April 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 17: 1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 20 days. 2. The reasons for causing the delay as available in Para 3 of the interlocutory application is that the time of 20 days has been consumed in getting the certified copy and arranging other relevant documents. 3. Mr. Ashok Kr. Jha, learned counsel representing the respondent ha...
MUMBAI, India, April 18 -- Reserve Bank of India issued the following press release: The following State Governments have offered to sell stock by way of auction, for an aggregate amount of ₹16,900 Crore (Face Value). Sr. No. State Amount to be raised (₹ Crore) Tenor (Year) Type of Auction 1. Andhra Pradesh 1800 08 Yield 1800 16 Yield 1000 30 Yield 2. Maharashtra 1600 08 Yield 1600 18 Yield 800 28 Yield 3. Punjab 1300 12 Yield 4. Rajasthan 1200 10 Yield 1800 Re-issue of 7.99% Raj...
NAINITAL, India, April 17 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 17: 1. Heard Shri Tarun Pande and Shri Ashish Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner-firm, and Ms. Puja Banga, learned counsel for the respondents-State. 2. The petitioner-firm has assailed the order dated 21.08.2024 passed by respondent no. 2, under Section 73(9) of the C.G.S.T Act/ UKGST Act, demanding tax of Rs. 7,97,278/-, along with interest of Rs. 7,49,442/- and penalty of Rs. 79,728/-,...
NAINITAL, India, April 17 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 17: 1. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, prays for withdrawal of the Writ Petition, with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition with proper prayers. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition. 3. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
NAINITAL, India, April 17 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 17: 1. Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Lalit Samant, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by Condition No. 1 in the Tender Notice, whereby the intending bidder should be a domicile of the State. It is submitted that such a condition, in Tender Notice dated 02.03.2026, is violative of Articles 14 & 19 of the Constitution of Indi...