JABALPUR, India, March 8 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 6: 1. Corpus has been produced in Court by Shri Rajkumar Shukla, ASI of Police Station, Gourihar, District Chhatarpur and Ms. Sandhya Sharma, Constable-1592 of 6th Battalion, Jabalpur. She states that she wishes to reside with the petitioner. 2. In view of the above, petition is disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: I.A. No. 16833 of 2025 1. Heard Mr. Mayank Mohit Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned A.P.P. 2. This application has been preferred by the appellant for grant of bail during the pendency of the appeal. The appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the IPC and has been sentenced undergo R.I. for life along with the fine of Rs. 20,000/-. 3. It has been alleg...
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: I.A. No. 17084 of 2025 1. Heard Mr. Vishnu Prabhakar Pathak, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned A.P.P. 2. This interlocutory application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 05 days in filing the appeal. 3. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 05 days in filing the appeal is hereby co...
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: I. A. No. 16094 of 2025: Heard Mr. Prem Mardi, learned counsel for the appellants and learned Special P.P. for the State. This interlocutory application has been preferred by the appellants for condoning the delay of 54 days in filing this appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 54 days in filing this appeal is hereby condoned. I. ...
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mahtha, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. None appears for the State. This appeal is directed against the order dated 18.12.2025 passed in Misc. Cri. Application No. 335 of 2025 arising out of Chandrapura P. S. Case No. 190 of 2014 corresponding to S. T. No. 238 of 2025 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge - I, Bermo at Tenughat whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail o...
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: Heard Mr. Utpal Kant, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. This appeal is directed against the order dated 18.11.2025 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-IX, Giridih in B.P. No. 678/2025 in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 244/2025, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that from the possession of the appellant, ninety fak...
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: 1. Heard Mr. Shailendra Jit, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned A.P.P. 2. This application has been preferred by the appellant for grant of bail during the pendency of this appeal. The appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 376 of the IPC and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for ten years along with fine of Rs. 10,000/-. 3. It has been alleged that on the pretext o...
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: 1. This civil review has been filed by the State to review the Award dated 13.07.2024 passed in WP(S) No. 1298 of 2023 passed in the National Lok Adalat. 2. Award which has been arrived at settlement in National Lok Adalat cannot be a subject matter of review jurisdiction as no review under section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Order 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure is maintainable against the...
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: 1. Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 2. An objection is raised by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents that the order which the petitioner is challenging is appealable. He refers to the Standing Order of the Company. He submits that as per Clause 37 of the Standing Orders, all the workmen shall have the right to appeal against any order of any authority to the next Superior Officer...
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The counter-affidavit has been filed wherein the respondent has submitted that the payment has been made. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that still Rs.40,000/- has remained to be paid. 4. Considering the said submission, I direct the petitioner to file representation within four weeks before the District Land Acquisition Officer, Bokaro -respondent No.2 for payment ...