RANCHI, India, Oct. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 8: 1. Heard Mr. Vikash Kumar, learned counsel for the review petitioner and Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-CMPDI as well as Mr. Shubham Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3. 2. This review application has been preferred by the petitioner for review of the order dated 23.01.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No. 10 of 2024. 3. Mr. Vikash Kumar, learned counsel for the pe...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 8: 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants. 2. This appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 08.08.2017 (decree sealed and signed on 21.08.2017) passed by learned District Judge-XV, Dhanbad in Title Appeal No. 44 of 2013 whereby the appeal preferred by the appellants has been dismissed and the judgment dated 18.03.2013 (decree signed on 22.03.2013) passed by learned Civil Judge...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 8: 1. Nobody appears on behalf of the parties. 2. This appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 22.05.2017 (decree signed on 05.06.2017) passed by the learned A.J.C. XIII, Ranchi reversing the judgment dated 23.12.2009 (decree signed on 08.01.2010) passed by the learned Sub-Ordinate Judge-I, Khunti in Title Suit No. 5 of 1996. 3. The matter has remained pending before this Court since 2017 and the orde...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 8: 1. In view of Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, 1982, it transpires that the Criminal Revision is maintainable and the High Court can entertain the petition passed in the final form under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. In view of that, office objection is overruled. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel appearing for the O.P. No.2. 3. Le...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 8: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is confining his prayer to the order dated 17.10.2023 in the present criminal revision and he is not pressing other orders under challenge in the present petition and he submits in view of that, this petition may kindly be heard considering the order dated 17.10.2023. 2. Learned counsel for the State submits that it is upon the Court to decide the same in ...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 8: 1. Heard Ms. Ashwini Priya, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Santosh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the State and Md. Faruque Ansari, learned counsel for opposite party no.2. 2. This criminal revision petition is directed against the order dated 01.04.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VIII, Palamau, Daltonganj in Criminal Revision No.57 of 2013 (arising out of Misc. Case No.44 of ...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 8: 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. I.A. No.5017 of 2023 has been filed for condoning the delay of 200 days in filing the Criminal Revision Petition. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is trying to settle the matter with O.P. No.1, which is not occurred and in view of that, such delay of 200 days in filing this Petition is there and the delay may k...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 8: 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. Notice to the O.P. No.1 has been effected and the counsel for O.P. No.1 has appeared through Vakalatnama, but on repeated calls, nobody appears on behalf of O.P. No.1. 2. I.A. No.4433 of 2023 has been filed for condonation of delay of 43 days in filing the Criminal Revision Petition. 3. Learned counsel appeari...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 8: I. A. No. 10842 of 2025: Heard Mr. Suraj Kishore Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Prabir Kumar Chatterjee, learned Special P.P. for the State. This interlocutory application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 60 days in filing this appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 60 days in filing th...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 8: I. A. No. 10607 of 2025: Heard Mr. Yuvraj Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mrs. Vandana Bharti, learned A.P.P. for the State. This interlocutory application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 22 days in filing this appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 22 days in filing this appeal is hereby ...