RANCHI, India, April 15 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 13: Heard the parties. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for modification of the order dated 06.07.2021 passed in A.B.A. No.1730 of 2021. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that vide order dated 06.07.2021 passed in A.B.A. No.1730 of 2021, the petitioner was given the privileges of anticipatory bail and directed to surrender in the cour...
RANCHI, India, April 15 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. The tax effect in this appeal is admittedly below Rs. 2 crores. However, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, learned counsel for the appellant, states that he has no instructions to withdraw this appeal. 3. Accordingly, we dispose of this appeal on the grounds of low tax effect by keeping open the questions of law. 4. However, at the later stage, if the appellant finds tha...
RANCHI, India, April 15 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this appeal, on the grounds of low tax effect. 2. Accordingly, we allow the withdrawal of this appeal leaving the questions of law open. 3. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, April 15 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. The tax effect in this appeal is admittedly below Rs. 2 crores. However, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, learned counsel for the appellant, states that he has no instructions to withdraw this appeal. 3. Accordingly, we dispose of this appeal on the grounds of low tax effect by keeping open the questions of law. 4. However, at the later stage, if the appellant finds tha...
RANCHI, India, April 15 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. The tax effect in this appeal is admittedly below Rs. 2 crores. However, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, learned counsel for the appellant, states that he has no instructions to withdraw this appeal. 3. Accordingly, we dispose of this appeal on the grounds of low tax effect by keeping open the questions of law. 4. However, at the later stage, if the appellant finds tha...
RANCHI, India, April 15 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. The tax effect in this appeal is admittedly below Rs. 2 crores. However, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, learned counsel for the appellant, states that he has no instructions to withdraw this appeal. 3. Accordingly, we dispose of this appeal on the grounds of low tax effect by keeping open the questions of law. 4. However, at the later stage, if the appellant finds tha...
RANCHI, India, April 15 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. The tax effect in this appeal is admittedly below Rs. 2 crores. However, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, learned counsel for the appellant, states that he has no instructions to withdraw this appeal. 3. Accordingly, we dispose of this appeal on the grounds of low tax effect by keeping open the questions of law. 4. However, at the later stage, if the appellant finds tha...
RANCHI, India, April 15 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The tax effect in these appeals is admittedly below Rs. 2 crores. However, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, learned counsel for the appellant/s, states that he has no instructions to withdraw these appeals. 3. Accordingly, we dispose of these appeals on the grounds of low tax effect by keeping open the questions of law. 4. However, at the later stage, if the appellant/s f...
RANCHI, India, April 15 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 13: Heard Mr. Aditya Kr. Jha, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. This appeal is directed against the order dated 20.11.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Dhanbad in B.P. No. 954/2025 in connection with Dhanbad G.R. P.S. Case No. 104/2025, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that the Police had recovered two mi...
GUWAHATI, India, April 15 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on March 13: 1. Heard Mr. A. H. Algamgir, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. M. P. Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam. Facts:- 2. The fact of the instant case starts with lodging of an Ejahar on 11.06.2012 by the father of the victim, wherein it is alleged inter alia that ten years back, his daughter was married of to one Nasiruddin, who died and from the said wedlock, the victim had two children....