RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. The appellants are the claimants in whose favour, award of compensation has been made in OA Case No. (IIU)/RNC/2014/0022. The appeal is for enhancement of compensation as the interest has not been awarded from the date of accident as per the mandate of law under Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that the compensation on the interest has ...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. It is informed by the learned counsel on behalf of both sides that the matter was earlier referred for Special Mediation Drive-Mediation "For the Nation". 2. As per the Mediation Report, the matter has been amicably settled on condition of payment of Rs.2,50,000/- to the appellant (Malti Devi) by way of bank transfer within 30 days. 3. In view of the settlement between the parties, the instant Miscella...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. In pursuance of the order dated 20.12.2024, notice was issued to the sole respondent. However, as per the office note dated 20.08.2025, it appears that no such person exists at the given address. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant, in view of the aforesaid, has submitted that he may be allowed to take fresh service of notice upon the sole respondent on his present and correct address. 3. In...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This first appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 29th March 2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge-II (Senior Division), Seraikella in Reference Case No. 08 of 1989. 3. The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant is seeking enhancement of compensation with respect to the acquisition of land. He has s...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: Ms. Ishani Singh, learned Associate Counsel associated with Mr. Vishal Kumar, learned counsel on record, seeks leave of this Court to not press the instant appeal, as the parties are now residing together. Accordingly, instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and as such disposed of Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 24 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: The learned counsel for the petitioner is found absent today on call. Ms. A. Gayan, learned Central Government Counsel for all the respondents is present. In view of absence of the learned counsel for the petitioner, list the case again on 01.09.2025. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 24 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking to invoke the inherent powers of the Court available under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] on being aggrieved by a Notice issued under Section 179, BNSS on 06.08.2025 through WhatsApp by the Investigating Officer [I.O.] of the case seeking his presence before him on that very day. 2. I have heard Mr. N.H. Barbhuiya, learn...
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 24 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: Trial Court records as called for is not received. List this matter on 28.08.2025. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 24 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. Heard Ms. T. Som, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Ms. A. Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent no.1 and Ms. S. Khataniar, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. 2. This is an appeal against the judgment dated 28.07.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, Majuli in Special Case No.47/2023, by which the appellants have been convicted under Section 6 of the POCSO ...
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 24 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. Heard Mr. M. U. Mahmud, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. N. J. Khataniar, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 5. Also heard Mr. D. K. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 3 & 4 and Mr. M. I. Hussain, learned counsel for the respondent No. 6. 2. The appellant has put to challenge the order dated 11.05.2023, by which he was removed from the post of President of the Scho...