RANCHI, India, Feb. 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 22: 1. By filing this interlocutory application the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the State has no objection. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. This interlocutory application is allowed. 5. Consequently, WP(S) No.2152 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Feb. 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 22: 1. Heard the parties. 2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for setting aside the punishment order as contained in memo No. 154 dated 10.1.2021 passed by respondent No. 4, whereby, increment was forfeited for six months and also to set aside the order as contained in memo No. 1410 dated 12.5.2021 passed by the respondent No. 3, whereby the appeal of the petitioner has been dismissed. 3...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 22: 1. Heard the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the appellate order as contained in Memo No. 1287 dated 13.8.2013 (Annexure-6) passed by respondent No. 2and the order of punishment as contained in Memo No. 445 dated 3.3.2013 (Annexure-4) passed by respondent No. 4, whereby the petitioner has been imposed a punishment of withholding of two annual increments with cumulati...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 22: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ application. 2. Permission is accorded. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands dismissed as withdrawn. Pending, I.As if any, is also closed. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Feb. 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 22: 1. Mr. Nawal Kishor Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner on instruction of his client seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn without any liberty. 4. I.A. No.671 of 2026 stands dismissed. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Feb. 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 22: 1. Heard the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: (i) Arrears of salary for the period of February 2000, September 2000, October 2000 and November 2000. (ii) Uniform allowance for the period of 1997-2000. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as her representation is already pending before the respondents, suffice it would be, if a directi...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 22: 1. Heard, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. By filling this writ petition the petitioner is praying to quash the order dated 27.11.2020, contained in Memo No.6156 by which after conclusion of the departmental proceeding, the petitioner has been inflicted with punishment of stoppage of three increments without any cumulative effect. ...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 22: 1. Heard, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsels appearing on behalf of the JSSC. 2. The issue involved and sought to be raised in this writ petition has already been decided by Hon'ble Coordinate Single Bench of this Court in W.P.(S) No. 582 of 2023 (Mina Kumari Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Others along with Analogous Cas...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 22: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has received instruction from the petitioners to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Feb. 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 22: 1. Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State. 2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that she is not getting the family pension on death of her husband. 3. The husband of the petitioner died on 23.09.2023 after superannuation and he was working as Chowkidar in the Animal Husbandry Department but after his death the family pension has not commence...