RANCHI, India, Sept. 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 22: 1. This Civil Review Petition has been filed against the order dated 26.03.2021 passed in WP(S) No.1655 of 2016 by this Court, whereby this Court has set-aside the impugned order dated 26.11.2015. 2. Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned SC to L&C-II on instruction submits that this Civil Review Petition has become infructuous and in view of that, he seeks permission to withdraw this Civil Review Petition. 4. This Ci...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 22: 1. The matter relates to Vigilance P.S. Case No.29/1999, corresponding to Vigilance (Spl.) Case No.6(A) of 1999, pending in the Court of the learned Special Judge, ACB, Ranchi. 2. Mr. Shadab Eqbal, learned counsel for the petitioner on instruction seeks permission to withdraw this criminal revision petition. 3. Learned counsel for the ACB has got no objection. 4. Accordingly, this criminal revision peti...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 22: 1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons stated in the application duly supported by the affidavit of the appellant/applicant, we find that sufficient cause has been explained which prevented the appellant from filing the appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. Accordingly, the delay of 95 days in filing of the appeal is condoned. 2. The present interlocutory applicatio...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 22: 1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons stated in the application duly supported by the affidavit of the appellant/applicant, we find that sufficient cause has been explained which prevented the appellant from filing the appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. Accordingly, the delay of 95 days in filing of the appeal is condoned. 2. The present interlocutory applicatio...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 22: Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 1. The appellants preferred the instant Misc. Appeal against the impugned judgment/ order dated 19.12.2023 passed by Member (Technical), Railway Claim Tribunal, Ranchi, in Case No.OA (IIU)/ RNC/31/2023 whereby and whereunder the learned Tribunal has dismissed the claim application of the applicants/ appellants. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant...
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 23 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 22: 1. Mr. B. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent is present. None appears for the appellant. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent that the respondent has expired during the pendency of the appeal and matter may be adjourned for the day. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. Let the matter be listed for hearing on 28.08.2025. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 23 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 22: 1. Heard Mr. PK Roychoudhury, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam representing Respondent No.1 as well as Mr. S. Das, the learned counsel representing Respondent No.2. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying for quashing the Charge Sheet No.87/2020 dated 22.10.2020 relating to Al...
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 23 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 22: 1. Heard Mr. O.P. Bhati, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam representing Respondent No.1 whereas Mr. R.R. Gogoi, the learned counsel represents Respondent No.2. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying for quashing the FIR dated 30.11.2020 lodged by the Assistant Inspector of Excise, ...
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 23 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 22: 1. Heard Mr. D.P. Borah, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. N. Uddin, the learned counsel representing respondent. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying for quashing the proceedings of C.R. Case No.671/2016 pending in the court of Munsiff Magistrate No.1, Goalpara. 3. Respondent is the complainant in the C.R. Case No.671/2016. She...
GUWAHATI, India, Sept. 23 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Aug. 22: 1. Heard Mr. S. Chamaria, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. A. Tiwari, the counsel representing the respondents. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying for quashing the order dated 09.06.2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class No.4, Kamrup(M), Guwahati in C.R. Case No.3845c /2022. 3. The respondent being the compl...