PATNA, India, Sept. 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 11: Heard the parties. 2. At the relevant time, while the petitioner was holding the post of Branch Manager, Ghorasahan Branch, Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank, he was subjected to departmental proceeding, on the charges of, inter alia, issuing a manifold to the Motihari Branch for issuance of bankers cheque of Rs. 6,36,544/- in favour of Bank of India, without confirming about the earlier manifold and without obtaining pa...
PATNA, India, Sept. 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 11: The present criminal appeal has been preferred under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of acquittal dated 30.05.2024 passed by the learned Exclusive Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Patna in Special Case No. 209 of 2017, arising out of Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 73 of 2017, whereby Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 have been acquitted by the learned Trial Court from the charge of Sections 147, 1...
PATNA, India, Sept. 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 11: The present criminal appeal has been preferred under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of acquittal dated 09.03.2022 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Trial No.213 of 2004 arising out of Pauthu P.S. Case No.171 of 2003, whereby Respondent Nos. 2 to 7 have been acquitted by the learned Trial Court from the charge of Sections 148, 307/149, 386 of the Indi...
PATNA, India, Sept. 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 11: Re: I. A. No. 02 of 2024 The present interlocutory application has been filed under Section-5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 20 days caused in preferring the present appeal. 2. Heard Mr. Pankaj Kumar Das, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, Mr. Arun Kumar Bhagat, learned A.C. to AAG-12 for the State and Mr. Mithilesh Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent No.6. 3. We have conside...
PATNA, India, Sept. 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 11: The present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed under provisions of Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the Patna High Court Rules against the order dated 13.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 5793 of 2021. 2. Heard Mr. Alok Kumar Chaudhary, learned Senior Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Jitendra Kishore Verma, learned Advocate for the respondent no. 11. 3. Learned Senior Advocate ap...
PATNA, India, Sept. 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 11: This application is filed under Section-5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 43 days in preferring the present appeal. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants/appellants and learned counsel for the respondent. 3. We have considered the submissions canvassed by learned counsel for the parties and gone through the averments made in the present interlocutory application. 4. In view of the aver...
PATNA, India, Sept. 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 11: In the instant LPA, appellants - Life Corporation of India have assailed the order of the learned Single Judge dated 16.09.2019, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 11313 of 2015. 2. Limited contention taken by the appellants is that it is a case of remand, having regard to the alleged charge which is in criminal in nature. Therefore, merely not adhering to certain principles of natural justice, the learned Single Judge has...
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 9 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 11: Petitioner is present in Court. Corpus has been produced in the Court by Ms. Priyanka Mehra, Sub Inspector Police Station - Panagar, Jabalpur (M.P.). She is aged about 22 years and states that she has left her parental home out of her own wish and has now performed the marriage with one Jatin Kumar. She wishes to stay with her husband at her matrimonial house. Since the corpus is a major, n...
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 9 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 11: Petitioner is present in the Court. Parents of the corpus is also present in the Court. Corpus has been produced in the Court by Shri Santosh Kumar Patel, ASI, Police Station - Majhgava, Tehsil - Sihora. She states that she does not wish to stay with the petitioner and of her own free will she is living at her parental home. She states that she is not under any wrongful confinement. Since th...
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 9 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 11: 1. In all these writ petitions, a common question of fact and law is involved and therefore, they are heard analogously and disposed of by this common order. 2. A common grievance of the petitioners in this batch of writ petitions is with regard to grant of annual increment which became due on completion of one year's service before attaining the age of superannuation. In some of the cases, t...