GUWAHATI, India, June 6 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on May 6: On request made by Mr. N. K. Sarma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. H. K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners, list these matters after 1 (one) week. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, June 6 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on May 6: Heard Mr. R. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. U. Sarma, learned standing counsel for the respondents in the Secondary Education Department and Mr. A. Chaliha, learned standing counsel for the respondents in the Finance Department. During the course of hearing, Mr. Sarma, learned standing counsel for the respondents in the Secondary Education Department has produced a letter of the Direc...
GUWAHATI, India, June 6 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on May 6: On the prayer of Mr. B. Choudhury, learned counsel for the APDCL, who submits that he has not received the photographs along with the official records, list this matter on 10.06.2025. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, June 6 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on May 6: Due to the paucity of time the orders could not be delivered today. Accordingly, Registry to list these matters again on 27.05.2025, for delivery of orders. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, June 6 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on May 6: 1. Heard Mr. R.S. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. B. Chakraborty, learned Central Government Counsel [CGC] for the respondent no. 1; and Mr. K. Jain, learned counsel representing Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned Standing Counsel, CGST for the respondent nos. 2 - 5. 2. The petitioners have approached this Court by the present writ petition instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assa...
GUWAHATI, India, June 6 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on May 6: 1. Heard Mr. M.K. Choudhury, learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner assisted by Mr. K. Kalita. Mr. M. Chetia, learned counsel appears for the respondent Nos.1 & 2; Mr. B. Chakraborty, learned counsel appears for the respondent Nos.3-6, i.e., the Dhing Municipal Board, while Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Sr. Counsel assisted by Mr. B. Kaushik, learned counsel appears for the respondent No.7. 2. The petitioner is a...
GUWAHATI, India, June 6 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on May 6: 1. The petitioners have instituted the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail an Order of Eviction dated 04.04.2025 passed by the respondent no. 4, whereby, the respondent no. 4 has ordered for eviction of the petitioner no. 2 and all persons who may be in occupation of the concerned public premises or any part thereof within a period of fifteen days from the date of public...
GUWAHATI, India, June 6 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on May 6: 1. Heard Mr. P. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.J. Talukdar, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate as well as Ms. D. Mushahary, learned standing counsel, Secondary Education Department and Mr. A. Chaliha, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department. 2. This is the third round of writ petition by the petitioners seeking financial assistance to the petitioner schools since for...
GUWAHATI, India, June 6 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on May 6: 1. This writ appeal is filed by the appellant challenging the judgment & order dated 20.10.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.4883/2018, whereby the learned Single Judge has set aside the selection and appointment of the appellant as Gaonburah of Charge No.17, Mouza - Barpeta under Barpeta Revenue Circle, District - Barpeta and has directed the State authorities to initiate a fresh process of sel...
GUWAHATI, India, June 6 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on May 6: 1. Heard Mr. D. Majumdar, learned Addl. Advocate General along with Ms. S. Sarma, learned Government Advocate appearing for the appellants. None has appeared for the respondent no. 1 in spite of service of notice. Also heard, Mr. A. Chaliha, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department representing the proforma respondent no. 2. 2. The present Intra-Court appeal has been instituted, presenting a challenge to a ...