NAINITAL, India, March 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHISH NAITHANI ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 14 of 2026 Jalun Ali alias Jainul Aabidin Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate through V.C. Counsel for the State : Mr. J.S. Virk, D.A.G. assisted by Mr. R.K. Joshi, Brief Holder. Hon'ble Ashish Naithani, J. The pres...
NAINITAL, India, March 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHISH NAITHANI ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 15 of 2026 Abbas Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate through V.C. Counsel for the State : Mr. S.S. Chauhan, D.A.G. assisted by Mr. Vikash Uniyal, Joshi, Brief Holder. Hon'ble Ashish Naithani, J. The present App...
AMARAVATI, India, March 12 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on 12 March: 1. This Appeal, under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure [for short, the C.P.C.'], is filed by the Appellant/defendant No.1 challenging the Decree and Judgment, dated 04.04.2003, in O.S.No.34 of 1999 passed by the learned V Additional District Judge, Tirupati [for short, the trial Court']. The Respondents herein are the plaintiffs and defendant Nos.2 and 3 in the said Suit. 2. The appellant ...
NAINITAL, India, March 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 10: 1. The present Contempt Petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of an order dated 25.11.2022, passed in Writ Petition (S/S) No.1445 of 2020 and batch. By the said order, the following direction was issued :- "Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the concerned Regional Provident Fund Commissioner to consider and...
NAINITAL, India, March 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 10: 1. This Contempt Petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of an order dated 07.04.2025, passed in Writ Petition No.2014 of 2023 (S/S). By the said order, the following direction was issued:- "10. The writ petition is allowed. The impugned office memorandum dated 13.05.2021 (Annexure 2 to the writ petition) is quashed. The respondent authorities are directed to refund the amount of Rs...
NAINITAL, India, March 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 10: 1. The present Contempt Petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of an order dated 25.11.2022, passed in Writ Petition (S/S) No.716 of 2020 and batch. By the said order, the following direction was issued :- " Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the concerned Regional Provident Fund Commissioner to consider and ...
NAINITAL, India, March 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 10: 1. The present Contempt Petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of an order dated 23.03.2023, passed in Writ Petition (S/B) No.364 of 2020. 2. The petitioner had placed the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 04.11.2022, passed in Special Leave Petition (C) No.8658-8659 of 2019 (Civil Appeal No.8143 of 2022 and 8144 of 2022), in the said Writ Petition (S/B) No.364 of 2020. ...
NAINITAL, India, March 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 10: 1) Heard counsel for the parties. 2) Delay of 189 days in filing the appeal is satisfactorily explained in the affidavit filed in support of the delay condonation application. Accordingly, delay is condoned. Office is directed to allot a regular number to the instant appeal. SPECIAL APPEAL NO. 1035 OF 2017 3) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 4) This intra-court Appeal is filed by the ...
NAINITAL, India, March 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 10: 1. At the time the appeal was entertained by the Coordinate Bench, the following order dated 07.01.2026 was passed: 1)"Mr. Neeraj Garg, learned counsel for the appellant. 2) Mr. Yogesh Tiwari, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the State/respondent nos. 1 & 4. 3) Mr. Rahul Consul, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 & 3. 4) The instant appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated...
NAINITAL, India, March 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 10: 1. Heard Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. K.K. Verma, learned counsel for respondent- writ petitioner. 2. The present intra-court appeal is directed against the order of learned Single Judge dated 30.03.2017 in Writ Petition (S/S) No.1150 of 2016, whereby the writ court has allowed the writ petition challenging the action of the appellants in ordering recovery of ...