PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 4: 1.The writ petition is filed for the following reliefs: " i) For the quashing the order dated 24.01.2018 passed by respondent District Magistrate, Jamui in confiscation case No. 1 of 2016 whereby four sealed gas cylinders, 2 empty gas cylinders and one empty commercial cylinders of H.P. Company were ceased have been confiscated exercising power under Section 6-A of Essential Commodities Act. ii) For further dire...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 4: Heard the parties. 2. The present application has been filed by the petitioner praying for the following reliefs: - (i) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of CERTIORARI for quashing the order dated 10.04.2024 passed by the Respondent no.2 in Case No.80 of 2021 (Raushan Mishra Vs. Ugan Jha @ Ugranath Jha) and communicated to all concerned under the signature of the Respondent no.3 and contained in ...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 4: 1.The writ petition is filed to quash the entire subsequent proceedings initiated by the District Certificate Officer in Certificate Case No. 7/2002/2003 (Electricity), including the order dated 14.10.2014, in which it has been recorded that the due amount has not been deposited, and the order dated 22.11.2017, by which the warrant of arrest has been issued against the petitioners in pursuance of the order dated 0...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 4: Heard the parties. 2. In the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:- (i)For commanding the respondents to undertake the measurement work of NH 107 in Ward no. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9 of the Nagar Panchayat Banmankhi, particularly in front of the houses of the petitioners and not to construct and widen the road over the khatiyani and raiyati lands of the petitioners unless and unti...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 4: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. In the present writ petition, petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- (i)For setting aside the notice dated 24.01.2022 contained in Letter No. 94 (Annexure-6) issued under the signature of Respondent Circle Officer, Maharajganj, DistrictSiwan against a dead person i.e. father of petitioner Late Shivnarayan Singh, directing t...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 4: 1. Heard the Learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs: "To issue a writ/writs and order/orders in the nature of certiorari for setting aside the order 27.12.17 passed in Case No. Gopalganj/92/03/CWJC/2017 passed by the Chairman the Hon'ble Justice Uday Sinha Judicial Inquiry Commission whereby and where under the case of the petitioner has bee...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 4: 1.Heard the Learned counsel for the parties. 2.The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs: "For setting aside the order dated 23.11.2017 passed by Hon'ble Justice Uday Sinha Judicial Enquiry Commission, Patna in Case No. Nawada/41/CWJC 17 whereunder and whereby the Hon'ble Commission has pleased to reject the the petition filed by the petitioner without adjudicating his claim whic...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 4: The contention of the writ petitioner is that a Panchayat Sarkar Building in the concerned Gram Panchayat is being constructed over a school land. 2. The counter affidavit indicates that one Taracharan Prasad @ Lal Mahto had wrongly transferred Government land to Sardar Patel High School. The records reveal that the land in question is recorded as Anabad Bihar Sarkar (Gair Majarua Aam land belonging to the State...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 4: Heard Mr. Mohd. Rustam Hussain, the learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Vikash Kumar, learned Advocate for the State. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that for no apparent good reason, the Panchayat Sarkar building in Nonea Dih Panchayat at Raxaul in the District of East Champaran is being constructed in a village with lesser population instead of the headquarter village of Mahadeva Tola. 3. The pe...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 4: Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present application has been preferred under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short, the 'Cr.P.C.') as to quash the order dated 15.07.2023 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-19, East Champaran Motihari, in connection with Cr. Revision No. 125/2023 arising out of Chakia P.S. Case No. 302 of 2022, whereby and whereunder learned trial court has b...