PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 3: 1. Heard the Learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs: "I. For a direction upon the respondents to re-calculate the compensation amount and pay the same to the petitioners with interest. II. For a direction upon the respondents to pay the compensation amount for the different types of actual nos. of trees which have been cut and the damages f...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 3: 1. The writ petition is filed for the following reliefs: "(i) For quashing the order dated 9.1.2018 passed by the Collector, Aurangabad (Respondent No.2) in PDS Appeal Case No. 31/2014 whereby the order of S.D.O. Aurangabad dated 23.7.2013 in Supply Misc. Case No. 79/2013 cancelling the licence of the petitioner has been affirmed and appeal was dismissed. (II) For quashing the order dated 23.7.2013 passed by the...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 3: Heard Mr. Manish Kumar No.2, learned counsel along with Mr. Ram Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. Madhaw Prasad Yadaw, learned GP-23 for the State and Mr. Faiz Ahmad, learned counsel for the University. 2. The petitioners in paragraph no. 1 of the present writ petition have sought, inter alia, following relief(s), which is reproduced hereinafter: That the present writ applicatio...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 3: Heard the parties. 2. The petitioners before this Court are the teaching and non teaching staffs of Krishna Vibhuti Balika Uchch Vidyalaya, Kudhni, Muzaffarpur and few of them are their dependents; on being aggrieved with the action of the respondents in not extending their salary and other retiral benefits, have approached this Court seeking a direction upon the respondents to ensure payment thereof, after calcu...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 3: Heard the parties. 2. In pursuant to the order of this Court dated 03.04.2025, a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.3. 3. It is categorically submitted that based upon the available documents/records, as also in view of the order of this Court, the services of the petitioner has been duly confirmed w.e.f. 11.01.1998 vide order as contained in Memo No.85, dated 19.06.2025, issued under th...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 3: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 25.09.2007 passed by the Collector, Araria in Case No. 8/2001-2002 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition), whereby the proceeding under Section 45B of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961 has been dropped on the grou...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 3: 1.Heard the Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the Learned counsel for the respondents. 2.The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs: (i)To issue a writ/writs and order/orders in the nature of 27 12-12 certiorari for setting aside the order 23.01.2018 passed in Case No. Gopalganj/91/02/CWJC/2017 passed by the Chairman the Hon'ble Justice Uday Sinha Judicial Inquiry Comm...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 3: Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: "(i) To issue a writ preferably in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the Respondent authority concerned to pay the petitioner his Graduate Pay scale and revise his monetary benefits including payment of differences of salary and pension etc. for which the petitioner is legally entitled w.e.f. 01....
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 3: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AC to GP-7 for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the University. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ application has been filed for a direction upon the respondents to make payment of the arrears of difference of salary to the petitioner for the period 01.04.1997 to 31.10.2014 to the tune of Rs.8,92,680/- which ha...
PATNA, India, July 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 3: Heard Mr. Rajeev Nayan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Ms. Usha Kumari-1, learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This application has been preferred under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short, the "Cr.P.C.") as to quash the order dated 07.03.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Special Judge (POCSO Act), Nawada in POCSO Case No. 10 of 2024, arising out of...