RANCHI, India, Nov. 12 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 13: 1. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application in order to file fresh application. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not have any objection. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid fact, the instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Pending I.A., is also closed. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Nov. 12 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 13: This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking award of tender and since the tender condition has been rendered infructuous, this petition is disposed of accordingly. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Nov. 12 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 13: 1. The instant application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for a direction upon the respondent-authorities to remove the schedule property of the petitioner from prohibited list in NGDRS as the land in question is transferrable in nature and is owned and possessed by the petitioner and is having markable title. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent-State produced a correction slip...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 12 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 13: Since the petitioner has an efficacious and alternative remedy of filing appeal against the impugned order, therefore, the instant petition is dismissed as not maintainable, reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail such remedy as available to it under the law. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Nov. 12 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 13: 1. Mr. Preeti Hembrom, Advocate, has submitted that the arguing counsel Mr. Subhashish Rasik Soren, is out of station due to some personal reason. 2. Put up this case after four (04) weeks and till then, the interim order dated 24.04.2025 passed by this Court shall continue. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Nov. 12 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 13: 1. The office note dated 01.09.2025 reflects that the notice has been received personally by the petitioner, however, there is still no appearance. 2. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revision, being Cr. Revision No. 688 of 2009, is dismissed for non-prosecution. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Nov. 12 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 13: 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for petitioner. 2. This Cr. Revision Petition has been preferred challenging the Judgment dated 09/5/2024 passed in Original Maintenance Case No. 118 of 2022, pursuant to the application filed under section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code by the Opposite Party No.2 and by the said judgment, learned Principal Judge, Family Court Sahibganj has been pleased to allow the sai...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 12 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 13: I.A. No. 13172 of 2025 Heard the learned counsel for the respective sides. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning a delay of 7 days in filing the appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in this application, the delay of 7 days which had occurred in filing this appeal is condoned and this I.A. is allowed and disposed of. Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1248 of 2025 T...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 12 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 13: Heard Mr. Raja Ravi Shekhar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned Special P.P. appearing for the State. This appeal is directed against the order dated 07.07.2025 passed in A.B. P. No. 259 of 2025 arising out of Tinpahar P. S. Case No. 7 of 2025 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge I, Rajmahal whereby and whereunder the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellant has been rejected...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 12 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 13: 1. After some argument, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant has submitted that he does not intend to press the instant interlocutory application. 2. Such submission has been made in presence of learned counsel for the respondent-State. 3. Considering the submission made on behalf of the appellant, the instant interlocutory application being I.A. (Cr.) No. 184 of 2025 is dismissed as not pres...