RANCHI, India, Nov. 12 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 13: 1. None is present to represent the appellant. 2. Accordingly, this Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Nov. 12 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 13: 1. Both these appeals, preferred by the Union of India under Clause-10 of the Letters Patent, are directed against the common order/judgment dated 06.12.2022 passed in W.P.(C) No.1128 of 2020 (impugned in L.P.A. No.67 of 2023) and W.P.(C) No.1126 of 2020 (impugned in L.P.A. No.61 of 2023), whereby and whereunder, the writ petitions have been disposed of by quashing the show cause notices issued by the Deputy S...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 12 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 13: 1. Both these appeals, preferred by the Union of India under Clause-10 of the Letters Patent, are directed against the common order/judgment dated 06.12.2022 passed in W.P.(C) No.1128 of 2020 (impugned in L.P.A. No.67 of 2023) and W.P.(C) No.1126 of 2020 (impugned in L.P.A. No.61 of 2023), whereby and whereunder, the writ petitions have been disposed of by quashing the show cause notices issued by the Deputy S...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 12 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 13: 1. Mrs. Niki Sinha, learned C.G.C. appearing for the appellants-Union of India, on instruction, has submitted that all legally admissible dues have already been paid to the respondent no. 1, who is no more. Hence, as per instructions, she does not intend to press this appeal. 2. In view thereof, it has been submitted by the learned C.G.C. appearing for the appellants - Union of India, that the instant Letter...
RANCHI, India, Nov. 12 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Oct. 13: On the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant Misc. Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Pending I.A(s), if any, also stands disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 12 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 12: 1. Heard Mr. A Z Ahmed, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. L R Mazumder, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. G N Sahewalla, learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2. 2. The instant criminal petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, assailing the impugned order dated 11.11.2021 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ca...
GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 12 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 12: 1. This matter is specially assigned to this Bench by Hon'ble the Chief Justice in terms of the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay Vs. Union of India reported in 2023 SCC Online SC 1463 since the petitioner herein is a sitting Legislator (Member of Parliament) 2. Heard Mr. A. M. Bora, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. V. A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also ...
GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 12 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 12: 1. Heard Mr. R. Goswami, learned counsel for the appellant and also heard Mr. K. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the respondent No.1/claimant. 2. In this appeal, under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the appellant United India Insurance Company Ltd. has challenged the judgment and award dated 05.11.2014 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Sonitpur (Tribunal he...
GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 12 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 12: 1. Heard Mr. Sishir Dutta, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. K. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1-4, Mr. S. Sahu, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.5 and 6 and Ms. A. Biyani, learned counsel for the respondent No.7. 2. In this appeal, under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the appellant Oriental Insurance ...
GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 12 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 12: 1. Heard Mr. S. Banik, leaned counsel for the appellant, and Mr. R. C. Paul, learned standing counsel for the respondent No.2. None appears for the respondent No.1. 2. In this appeal, under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the appellant has challenged the judgment and award dated 30.10.2019, passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sonitpur at Tezpur (learned Tribunal, for sh...