JABALPUR, India, March 11 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 9: Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition reserving the right of the petitioner to approach afresh if the appeal is not decided within reasonable time. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, March 11 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 9: Learned counsel for petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition, reserving the right of the petitioner to pursue other remedies. In view of the above, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, March 11 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 9: Appellant, who appears in person, seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. Appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, March 11 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 9: 1. Appellant impugns order dated 27.09.2025, whereby the petition filed by the appellant challenging the transfer order dated 30.06.2025 has been dismissed. By an order dated 30.06.2025 appellant was transferred from the office of MPPKVVCL Nadan Kendra Maihar, District Maihar to the office of Executive Engineer (Store), Satna. Petitioner challenged the transfer by way of a writ petition being W...
JABALPUR, India, March 11 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 9: 1. Appellant has assailed the order dated 26.08.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.17216/2025; whereby the writ petition preferred by the appellant was dismissed. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the father of appellant expired on 03.12.2020 and the appellant applied for compassionate appointment, which was duly granted to the appellant vide order dated 02.11.2...
AGARTALA, India, March 11 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 10: 1. This present appeal under Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973 has been filed against the order of conviction and sentence passed by learned Special Judge (POCSO), in Case No. SPECIAL (POCSO) 38/2019 vide Judgment dated 22.03.2023 which learned Trial Court convicted and sentenced the appellant-petitioner to suffer RI for 20 (Twenty) years and to pay fine of Rs. 30,000/- only under Sect...
JABALPUR, India, March 11 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 9: 1. The instant intra court appeal has been preferred by the appellant being aggrieved by the order dated 21.08.2025 passed by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.20383/2016, whereby the writ petition preferred by respondent No.1 was allowed with a direction to the appellant to extend the benefit of third ACP on completion of 30 years of service, from the date of initial appointment. 2. H...
AGARTALA, India, March 11 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 10: 1. This present appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C, 1973 against the judgement and order of conviction and sentence dated 12.08.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Dhalai Judicial District, Ambassa, in connection with the case No. Special (POCSO) 04 of 2022 convicting the appellant to suffer R.1 for 10 (Ten) years for the commission of offence punishable under section...
JABALPUR, India, March 11 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 9: 1. The appellant impugns order dated 13.11.2025, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant has been dismissed. 2. The appellant is a guest faculty and has now been declared as "fallen out" on account of regular posting in respective government college. The factual position was that no guest faculty was permitted to be replaced by a guest faculty and was permitted to be replaced by a re...
AGARTALA, India, March 11 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 10: This present application has been filed for condoning a delay of 3580 days in preferring the connected appeal, challenging the impugned Judgment of Conviction and Order of Sentence dated 27.02.2016 and 29.02.2016. Heard learned counsel appearing for both the parties. For the reasons stated in the affidavit appended to this application, this present interlocutory application is allowed and the de...