RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs :- "(a) for issuance of an appropriate writ, order, or direction, including Writ of Mandamus, commanding upon Respondent No.2 to take a decision on the representation made by the petitioner that has been pending since 07.01.2025 (Annexure-4) wherein request has been made for release of JCB Machin...
RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. Heard the parties. 2. This is a case of certiorari. Thus, it is not necessary to call for a counter-affidavit from the respondents. 3. The petitioner seeks to quash Annexure-12, which is a Communication dated 04.09.2025 by which the claim of compassionate appointment of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that he is aged more than 35 years. 4. After going through the records, I find that th...
RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner claims that she is the mother of the deceased-employee, namely, Late Takenarayan Kumar and after his death, the petitioner is entitled to get the retiral benefits. She also prays that daughter of this petitioner may be considered for compassionate appointment. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Central Coalfields Limited submits that there is rival claim a...
RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner's candidature for the post of Graduate Trained Teacher was not considered due to lack of requisite educational qualification. 3. The rejection order has been placed before this Court, which is at Annexure-16, at page 75, of this writ petition. The relevant portion is at page 80. In page No. 80 at Sl. No. 11, the name of the petitioner transpires and the ground for re...
RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:- 1. For issuance of an appropriate writ/order(s)/direction(s) including a writ of certiorari, for quashing/setting aside the Order No.- Disc/AA/Ord-46, dated 10.02.2020 (Annexure-9), passed by the Respondent No. 2 ie., Appellate Authority, whereby the Respondent No. 2 has wrongfully dismissed the appeal filed by the ...
RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Jharkhand Public Service Commission assists the Court. He submits that the petitioner is seeking appointment in terms of the Advertisement No. 03 of 2020 which was published for appointing suitable eligible candidate to the post of Registrar in the Universities of the State. He submits that the ...
RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: None appears on behalf of the appellant. The report of the Superintendent, Central Jail, Ghaghidih, Jamshedpur reveals that the appellant on completing his period of custody has been released on 14.07.2023. In view of the aforesaid fact, this appeal stands disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. Heard Mr. Sourabh Kumar Das, learned counsel for the appellant and learned P.P. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 25.09.2025 passed by the learned A.J.C.-VI, Ranchi in B.P. No.1280/2025 arising out of GRP/Muri P.S. Case No.05/2025, whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. 3. It has been alleged that under operation AAHT, a raid was conducted at Muri...
RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants-State. 2. I.A. No. 6475 of 2025, seeks condonation of delay of 395 days in instituting this L.P.A. against the learned Single Judge's judgment and order dated 22.11.2023 in W.P.(C) No. 3363 of 2023. 3. There is no proper explanation for this inordinate delay. The fact that the delay is ordinate is explicitly accepted in paragraph-14 of the I.A. Besides, again...
GUWAHATI, India, March 10 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. Heard Mr. R.A. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the accused-applicants. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State respondent. 2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused-applicants, namely, Rahul Amin Laskar and Saju Mia @ Suju Mia in connection with Hailakandi P.S....