RANCHI, India, Jan. 20 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Dec. 19: 1. Heard. 2. We find no reason to recall the observations as made in paragraphs 2, 34, 35, 36, 37 and 43 of the order dated 11.12.2025 passed in W.P. (PIL) No.4736 of 2018 and analogous cases as sought by the applicant-petitioner in this case, as there is no error apparent therein. Moreover, the applicant cannot be heard to convince this matter particularly when the appeals filed against the order dated 3rd ...
RANCHI, India, Jan. 20 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Dec. 19: 1. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief(s): "That through the instant writ petition, the petitioner prays for issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) particularly a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of public notice issued vide letter no. 2002 dated 03.12.2025 (Annexure-9 to this writ petition) under th...
RANCHI, India, Jan. 20 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Dec. 19: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that he is under instruction to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Jan. 20 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Dec. 19: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that he is under instructions to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Jan. 20 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Dec. 19: As prayed, four weeks' time is granted to counsel for the petitioner to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Registry, failing which the writ petition shall be deemed to be dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to the Bench. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, Jan. 20 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Dec. 19: 1. Heard Mr. P. Upadhyay, the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. This application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed by the petitioners, impugning the order dated 30.08.2025, passed by the court of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kamrup at Amingaon in Misc. Case No. 237/2024, whereby the plaint filed by the present petitioners in Title Suit No. 42/2023 was r...
GUWAHATI, India, Jan. 20 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Dec. 19: Heard Mr. M. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State. The allegation levelled against the petitioner involved the provision of POCSO Act. Therefore, in accordance with the prevalent notification, let notice be issued to the respondent No.2, in the meantime. Call for the scanned copy of TCR. List this matter again on 27.01.2026. Dis...
GUWAHATI, India, Jan. 20 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Dec. 19: 1. Heard Mr. U.S. Borgohain, learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This petition under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioner, namely, Aditya Paniphukan @ Aditya Sagar Paniphukan, for grant of pre-arrest bail in connection with CID PS Case No. 20/2025 under Sections 61(2)/329(3)/308(5)/111...
GUWAHATI, India, Jan. 20 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Dec. 19: 1. Heard Mr. M.R. Khandakar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned APP for the State of Assam. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for quite some time, has submitted that the petition may be closed as not pressed. 3. This Court clarifies that the petitioner has shown his interest before the this Court to face the trial proceedings, and his appr...
GUWAHATI, India, Jan. 20 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Dec. 19: Heard Mr. A. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State and Ms. A.S Prodhani, learned counsel appears on behalf of Ms. S. Talukdar, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that pursuant to the direction granted by this Court by the order dated 19.09.2025, the petitioner has appeared be...