PATNA, India, Feb. 12 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 12: 1. Heard Mr. N.K. Agrawal, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of the present bail application, the petitioner no. 2, namely, Dharam Kumar @ Dharmlal Mehta has been arrested. So the present bail application with respect to him has become infructuous. Hence, he...
PATNA, India, Feb. 12 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 12: 1. Heard Mr. Kumar Kamal Nayan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Md. Shakir Ahmad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 208 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 10.10.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 317(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. 3. According to prosecution case, the police have apprehended co-accus...
PATNA, India, Feb. 12 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 12: Call for the legible xerox copy of case diary, postmortem report of the deceased as well as FSL report in connection with Amarpur (Fullidumar) P.S. Case No. 670 of 2025 from the court concerned thereafter, list this matter on receipt of the same after four weeks. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
PATNA, India, Feb. 12 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 12: 1. Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Dr. Ajeet Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of the present bail application the petitioner no. 3, namely, Nathu Sah has been arrested. So the present bail application with respect to him has become infructuous. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw th...
PATNA, India, Feb. 12 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 12: 1. Heard Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case No. 135 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 14.07.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. 3. According to prosecution case, it is alleged by the informant ...
PATNA, India, Feb. 12 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 12: 1. Heard the parties. 2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Manikpur P.S. Case No. 117 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5) and 61(2) of the BNS and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. The main submissions advanced by the petitioner's counsel are that, as per the allegation, 10-12 persons, including the petitioner, assembled in an orchard allege...
PATNA, India, Feb. 12 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 12: 1. Heard the parties. 2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Maigra P.S. Case No. 84 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 65(1) of the B.N.S and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. 3. The main submissions advanced by the petitioner's counsel are that the victim has not supported the prosecution's allegations made in the FIR before the Judicial Magistrate while recording her statemen...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 484 of 2025 Prasanna Badini and Others - Revisionists Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others - Respondents Presence: Sri Piyush Tiwari, learned counsel for the Revisionists. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Sri Yogesh Upadhyay, learned co...
PATNA, India, Feb. 12 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 12: 1. Heard Mr. Digvijay Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Nirmala Kumari, learned APP for the State. 2. As prayed on behalf of the petitioner, put up this case on 13.01.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Revision No. 192 of 2023 Manorama Mathur - Revisionist Versus Raj Singh Chhetri Alias Indra Bahadur Chhetri and Another - Respondents Present: Ms. Gayatri Puri, Mr. Narender Yadav, and Mr. Jayant Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the revisionist/plaintiff. Mr. Siddhartha Singh and Mr. Priyanshu Gairola, learned counsel for the respondent. Hon'ble Mr. Ju...