NAINITAL, India, March 23 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 20: 1. Mr. Deep Prakash Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, S.C. for the State. 3. Mr. Shobhit Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for respondent nos.2, 3 and 4. 4. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner has put to challenge the suspension order dated 04.02.2026, annexure no.1 to the...
NAINITAL, India, March 23 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 20: 1. The present Application has been filed by the applicant-Smt. Suman for anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 688 of 2020, registered at Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar under Section 386 and Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2. The Anticipatory Bail Application of the applicant has been rejected by the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Roorkee, District Haridwar on 01.07.2025....
AGARTALA, India, March 23 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 20: Call for the Trial Court Record. Ld. PP will produce the CD on the next date. List the matter on 25.02.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
AGARTALA, India, March 23 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 20: Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. Admit. Issue Rule Nisi. Call for records-counter affidavit of respondents. It is the case of the writ petitioner that he approached this Court by filing second round of litigation and on earlier occasion he filed the writ petition being WP(C) No.401 of 2024 and this Court by its order dated 29.11.2024 declined to grant relief to the petitioner on...
AGARTALA, India, March 23 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 20: Learned Counsel Mr. A. Bhaumik along with Ms. Ishpa Chakma, Learned Counsel is present for the petitioners. Learned Addl. G.A. Mr. K. De appears for the respondents. Heard both the sides. List this matter on 23.03.2026 along with Review Petn. No.1 of 2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
AGARTALA, India, March 23 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 20: Ld. GA, Mr. Kohinoor. N. Bhattacharya for the respondents has again sought for an adjournment. Last chance is given to the respondents to participate in the hearing. List the matter on 05.03.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
AGARTALA, India, March 23 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 20: Heard both sides. Argument concluded. Judgment is reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
AGARTALA, India, March 23 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 20: [1] Heard Ld. Counsel Dr. Mihirlal Roy led by Ld. Sr. Counsel Mr. P.Roy Barman, for the petitioner. [2] Ld. Addl.GA, Mr. Dipankar Sarma appears and accepts notice for respondent nos.1 to 4. Ld. Counsel Mr. A. Chakraborty appears and accepts notice for respondent nos.5 and 6. [3] It is submitted from the side of petitioner that the petitioner went on superannuation on 31.03.2022 as Jr. Engineer, (...
AGARTALA, India, March 23 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 20: [1] Heard Ld. Counsel Dr. Mihirlal Roy led by Ld. Sr. Counsel Mr. P.Roy Barman, for the petitioner. [2] Ld. Addl.GA, Mr. Mangal Debbarma appears and accepts notice for respondent nos.1 to 4. Ld. Counsel Mr. A.Chakraborty appears and accepts notice for respondent nos.5 and 6. [3] It is submitted from the side of petitioner that the petitioner went on superannuation on 28.02.2022 as Jr. Engineer, ...
AGARTALA, India, March 23 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Feb. 20: 1. All respondents except respondent No.7 are served, but they have not engaged any counsel to defend themselves in these CRPs. So they are set ex parte. 2. Counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press these Revisions as against the respondent No.7 on the ground that she is residing in Bangladesh and the address of the said respondent is not known to the petitioner or her counsel. 3. Theref...