JABALPUR, India, Sept. 2 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 4: Petitioner has filed the subject petition titled as Aam Janta i.e. General Public. A petition in an ambiguous name would not be maintainable, in any case if petitioner wanted to file a public interest litigation he had to file the same in his own name not as Aam Janta through Shri Ramakant Mishra. The contention of the petitioner is that there is certain encroachment on a Government road and n...
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 2 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 4: Learned counsel for respondent submits that a proposal has been sent by the Collector for abandoning the subject project. He submits that in case the project is abandoned then necessary consequential refund of the security deposit shall take place. In view of the above statement, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition reserving the right of the petitioner to app...
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 2 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 4: Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition, reserving the rights of the petitioner to take appropriate remedies as may be permissible in the law Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 2 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 4: Learned counsel for petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petitions reserving the right of the petitioners to challenge the award under Section 3(G)(6) of the National Highway Act, 1956. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 2 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 4: Learned counsel for petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petitions reserving the right of the petitioners to challenge the award under Section 3(G)(6) of the National Highway Act, 1956. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 2 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 4: Learned counsel for petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petitions reserving the right of the petitioners to challenge the award under Section 3(G)(6) of the National Highway Act, 1956. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 2 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 4: Learned counsel for petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petitions reserving the right of the petitioners to challenge the award under Section 3(G)(6) of the National Highway Act, 1956. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 2 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 4: Learned counsel for petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petitions reserving the right of the petitioners to challenge the award under Section 3(G)(6) of the National Highway Act, 1956. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Sept. 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 1: 1. Heard Mr. M.B. Lal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Bishwambhar Shastri, learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Notice upon the O.P. No. 2 has already been effected, however he has chosen not to appear in the matter and earlier the matter was adjourned several times. 3. This revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 20.09.2019, passed by the learned Additional Sessions J...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 1: 1. Heard Mr. Rishav Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, learned A.P.P. appearing for the State and Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the O.P. No. 2. 2. This revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 06.08.2019, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur, in connection with Pakur (T) P.S. Case No. 186 of 2017 corresponding t...