PATNA HIGH COURT ISSUES ORDER ON RAJEEV KUMAR V/S THE STATE OF BIHAR

PATNA, India, Feb. 12 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 12: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Informant and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 329(3), 115(2) & 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. The case of the prosecution is that one Rohit @ Mandan has fired at the husband of the in...


UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT ISSUES JUDGMENT ON ANUPAMA PRAKASH V/S ANIRUDH SINGH AND OTHERS CASE

NAINITAL, India, Feb. 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 6: HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Revision No. 100 of 2025 06 January, 2026 Anupama Prakash - Revisionist Versus Anirudh Singh and others - Respondents Presence: Mr. Vishesh Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionist. Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel for the respondents. Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. The instant revision has been preferred by the defendant against the order dated 15.09...


PATNA HIGH COURT ISSUES ORDER ON RAMA NANDAN BHAGAT V/S THE STATE OF BIHAR

PATNA, India, Feb. 12 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 12: 1. Heard Mr. Digvijay Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Nirmala Kumari, learned APP for the State. 2. As prayed on behalf of the petitioner, put up this case on 13.01.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....


UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT ISSUES JUDGMENT ON SHADAB V/S STATE OF UTTARAKHAND CASE

NAINITAL, India, Feb. 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 06TH JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2456 of 2025 Shadab - Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand - Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Siddhartha Tomar, Advocate (through video conferencing) Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Akshay Latwal, Assistant Government Advocate Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. The ...


UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT ISSUES JUDGMENT ON BALJEET SINGH V/S STATE OF UTTARAKHAND CASE

NAINITAL, India, Feb. 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 6th JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1854 of 2025 Baljeet Singh - Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand - Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Mehboob Rahi, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Brief Holder. Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. Applicant Baljeet Singh is in judicial custo...


UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT ISSUES JUDGMENT ON HABIB V/S STATE OF UTTARAKHAND RESPONDENTS CASE

NAINITAL, India, Feb. 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 06TH JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1652 of 2025 Habib - Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand - Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder. Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. Applicant Habib is in judicial custody for th...


UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT ISSUES JUDGMENT ON PARAG CHAKLAAN ALIAS PARIKSHIT SHARMA V/S STATE OF UTTARAKHAND RESPONDENTS CASE

NAINITAL, India, Feb. 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 06th JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1445 of 2025 Parag Chaklaan alias Parikshit Sharma - Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand - Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Arvind Vashisth, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Pankaj Kumar Kaushik, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Brief ...


UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT ISSUES JUDGMENT ON MALKIT APPLICANT V/S STATE OF UTTARAKHAND RESPONDENTS CASE

NAINITAL, India, Feb. 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 06TH JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO.11 of 2026 Malkit Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder. Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. The applicant-Malkit is in judicial custody for the offence u...


UTTARAKHANDHIGH COURT ISSUES JUDGMENT ON SAGAR APPLICANT V/S STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER RESPONDENTS CASE

NAINITAL, India, Feb. 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 6th JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 7 of 2026 Sagar Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand and Another Respondents Counsel for the Applicant: Ms. Arushi Batra, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder. Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. The Applicant - Sagar is in custody for the offen...


CONVERSION/SWITCH OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA DATED SECURITIES

MUMBAI, India, Feb. 12 -- Reserve Bank of India issued the following press release: Government of India undertakes conversion/switch operations with market participants as well as with the Reserve Bank with the objective of smoothening its liability profile as well as for market development. As part of these operations, Government has undertaken conversion/switch transactions with the Reserve Bank on February 12, 2026 (settlement on February 13, 2026). The transactions involved Government buyin...